kuhy overruled the "do not fix coursework to be better than it was submitted"
rule: git history is the archive, so the working tree can be clean. This lands
the config and the mechanical half of the cleanup -- 9,281 ruff findings under
the fleet config down to 3,686, with no per-file-ignores anywhere.
What is in here:
- pyproject.toml, the first one in this repo. select = ["ALL"], mypy strict,
and the vendored list mirrored into ruff exclude and coverage omit. Five
rules are off and each says why; CPY001 is the only judgement call, because
stamping a copyright header onto 137 university assignments would assert a
licence that was never claimed. No hook is wired up yet -- a gate lands only
once its subject is clean.
- ruff format + the safe fixes, then a second pass over the docstring rules
ruff marks unsafe (they only edit docstring text). 108 files.
- TRAK/sightpy is vendored, not coursework: it is rafael-fuente/Python-Raytracer
(BSD 3-Clause). Verified against a fresh upstream clone with line endings
normalised -- 30 of 32 files byte-identical, ray.py and scene.py carrying a
12- and 13-line local patch that counts rays for the report. 35 files that
should never have been linted, now excluded and restored.
- WDWR, SPD, MOM and ECRYPT are fully clean, by hand and verified by running
them: WDWR's three plot scripts print the same statistics as before, MOM's
PuLP model solves to the same cost. WDWR's graph.py had a 342-character CSV
header embedded as a string literal, which cannot be wrapped -- the data
moved to data/pareto_front.csv. Two 0-byte .py stubs are deleted; an empty
file is not a deliverable and git still has it.
Three harness bugs found by actually running things:
- `run` now forces MPLBACKEND=Agg. TRAK finished its ray trace in 37 seconds
and then sat for 45 minutes: plt.show() had opened an image viewer and was
waiting for someone to close the window.
- TRAK's main.py only pops that viewer with --show now, and its runner writes
to a gitignored build/ via the new --entry-args. The default output path is
outputs/output.png, which is TRACKED -- a plain run overwrote a submitted
deliverable.
- course_lib.sh was 357 lines, over this repo's own cap. Split into
course_probe.sh and course_run.sh.
Verified: ECOTE 26 tests pass, ECRYPT_PROJECT 99 pass, TRAK renders
cornell_box in 37s and exits 0, every module compiles, and every import ruff
removed was checked to be genuinely unused.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
The 250-line cap applies to prose too, and the reports were the worst
offenders -- ENUME's projectA.tex alone was 1,876 lines. Each is now a
preamble plus one \input{} per section, which is how a long LaTeX document is
normally organised; not one byte of prose was rewritten.
"The PDF is unchanged" is checked by a script rather than by eye, because
hashing the PDF cannot work: pdflatex stamps a /CreationDate and an /ID into
every build, so two runs of the SAME source already differ. tex_fingerprint.sh
compares what a reader sees instead -- page count plus a hash of the extracted
text -- and it is stable across rebuilds of untouched sources, which is the
property that makes it usable as a gate.
It earned its keep immediately. Both ECOTE reports quote an example LaTeX
document inside an lstlisting block, so \end{document} appears in the middle
of the file; splitting on the FIRST one stranded everything after it. Same
page count, different text, caught automatically. EOPSY lab3 exposed a second
bug: a \section{} title that runs onto the next line.
Result: 19 .tex over the cap -> 1. The survivor,
ELAC/.../03-building-nfa-...tex, is 418 lines of consecutive tikz figures
with no subsection to split on and needs a hand-placed boundary.
Verified: 29 splits across two passes (section, then subsection for the
pieces still over), every one reporting `unchanged` from
scripts/tex_fingerprint.sh --check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
Running one directory (EADS) had already produced four bugs, so all of them
were run. 11 failed. Every one was real -- either in the coursework or in the
harness I had just written -- and the split was roughly even.
Coursework bugs:
- 15 .tex files use Polish ogonek characters with no fontenc, so pdflatex
dies with "Command \k unavailable in encoding OT1". Fixed where it was
actually needed, not blanket-applied.
- BSS had \documentclass{article}[12pt] -- options after the class name,
where they are not options at all.
- SDM's beamer deck had a stray } on an \item, which took out the frame.
- EOOP/Various/currency included "currency2.hpp"; the file is currency.hpp.
- ECRYPT_PROJECT had the SAME stdlib-shadowing bug as ECOTE: a package named
code/. Renamed to sieve/, and its 99 tests now run. With ECOTE's 26 that
is 125 tests that could not execute at all before today.
Harness bugs, which the run is what exposed:
- COURSE_ENTRY pointed at directories for PORR and ECRYPT_PROJECT, so python
looked for __main__.py and reported the wrong problem.
- main.py was auto-picked via find's first result. EARIN has six labs and
six main.py files, so that ran an arbitrary lab and called it the course.
Now only auto-picked when exactly one exists.
- Only the first requirements.txt was installed, which is why EARIN still
died on gymnasium after a venv was created for it. All of them now.
- The notebook probe accepted jupyter being on PATH. This machine's jupyter
is a pipx shim whose interpreter is gone, so "runnable" was a lie; it now
invokes jupyter --version and PBAD/twm_4 report blocked, honestly.
- Nothing ran a course's tests. Where a suite exists it is now the check,
which matters most for ECRYPT_PROJECT, whose program prompts on stdin and
cannot be run headlessly at all.
- Which directory pytest runs from is course-specific and unguessable, so
stubs pass --test-dir: ECOTE needs program/ for imports, ECRYPT_PROJECT
needs sieve/ because its fixtures open a CSV by relative path.
gates/known-incomplete.txt records the one file that genuinely cannot build:
EOOP/Various/set/set.cpp includes set.hpp, which `git log --all` shows has
never existed here. The course supplied it and only the .cpp was submitted.
That is a factual record with a stated check, not a lint allowlist -- and
fabricating the header would be inventing coursework.
Status is now 36 runnable / 5 no-code / 3 blocked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
Five files were outside README / CLAUDE* / DOCS* / TODO*, and two were over
the 250-line cap. Both gates now pass repo-wide.
Renames: the two lowercase readme.md files, and three documents into DOCS-*.
The AIS requirements doc split at its own boundary into functional (101) and
non-functional (174). The WDWR report split into six numbered sections behind
an index that keeps the original filename, 38-235 lines each; 753 lines of
body plus the 18-line header account for all 771 original lines, so nothing
was dropped.
That WDWR file needed checking before splitting: it sits next to main.tex and
main.pdf and looked like a conversion of them. It is not -- main.tex is
project 25406 and the markdown is project 18402, a different document. So it
is authored content and the split is real work, not churn on a build artifact.
Filled the three empty READMEs and replaced ECOTE's, which was a stale copy of
the root README still claiming the group projects were excluded -- they were
merged in by subtree some time ago.
EOPSY/lab1 turned out not to be the code-free directory the survey suggested:
it has modify.sh and modify_examples.sh. The oddly-named empty files beside
them are the exercise's OUTPUT, committed so the before/after state is
visible, and its README now says so rather than leaving them looking like junk.
CLAUDE.md follows the testsAndMisc structure. Writing it caught a nice one:
the md-naming marker is a biconditional, so quoting the literal removal string
in a non-TODO file fails the gate. The gate was right; the text is rephrased.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
