All 44 directories now probe: 38 runnable, 5 no-code, 1 blocked (ENUME needs
MATLAB or Octave, neither of which is on this machine).
The runners are stubs over one shared scripts/course_lib.sh rather than 44
copies of the logic, for the same reason the gates live in ~/utils. A stub
passes its kind as ARGUMENTS -- course_main --kind python --entry ... -- "$@"
-- rather than setting globals, because globals a linter cannot see being read
mean SC2034 on every one of them, and the only cure would be 44 disables.
Fixed along the way:
- Generating the stubs overwrote Programming/PSD/run.sh, the original
coursework runner. Restored, and given a --probe early exit instead so it
is otherwise untouched: it installs packages with sudo and starts Kafka,
which is exactly what a probe must not trigger.
- The probe guard only recognised runners containing the literal --probe, so
the new stubs (which delegate to the library) all read unprobed. It now
also accepts delegation to course_lib.sh.
- Blocked probes reported "unknown" because _require_any prints the tool it
found, so probes redirected its stdout -- swallowing the failure reason
too. Split into _probe_any, and ENUME now says exactly what it needs.
- shellcheck runs with -x so it follows the sourced library; without it every
stub reports SC1091 and the only alternative is a per-file disable. The
library itself carries `# shellcheck shell=bash` because it has no shebang
on purpose -- it is sourced, never executed.
Then EADS was actually run, and three of its six C++ files did not compile:
- lab3.cpp: copyDictionary was declared taking Dictionary* but its body used
Node members, and the copy constructor called copyTree(), which does not
exist. The copy also dropped key and balanceFactor. Now compiles AND runs,
printing its AVL tests.
- MidTerm/task2.cpp: a const mismatch between declaration and definition, a
stray semicolon before a function body, findNode calling a Tree method on
a treeNode*, and a while loop that never advanced. sumNodeSub also had no
base case -- unreachable before, because the const mismatch meant its body
was never compiled.
These compiled years ago because older GCC did not diagnose uninstantiated
template bodies. Fragments with no main() are now type-checked with -c rather
than linked, since two of these files are exam answers, not programs.
Binaries go to a gitignored build/ -- an extensionless executable dropped next
to its source is not something .gitignore catches by name.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
Five files were outside README / CLAUDE* / DOCS* / TODO*, and two were over
the 250-line cap. Both gates now pass repo-wide.
Renames: the two lowercase readme.md files, and three documents into DOCS-*.
The AIS requirements doc split at its own boundary into functional (101) and
non-functional (174). The WDWR report split into six numbered sections behind
an index that keeps the original filename, 38-235 lines each; 753 lines of
body plus the 18-line header account for all 771 original lines, so nothing
was dropped.
That WDWR file needed checking before splitting: it sits next to main.tex and
main.pdf and looked like a conversion of them. It is not -- main.tex is
project 25406 and the markdown is project 18402, a different document. So it
is authored content and the split is real work, not churn on a build artifact.
Filled the three empty READMEs and replaced ECOTE's, which was a stale copy of
the root README still claiming the group projects were excluded -- they were
merged in by subtree some time ago.
EOPSY/lab1 turned out not to be the code-free directory the survey suggested:
it has modify.sh and modify_examples.sh. The oddly-named empty files beside
them are the exercise's OUTPUT, committed so the before/after state is
visible, and its README now says so rather than leaving them looking like junk.
CLAUDE.md follows the testsAndMisc structure. Writing it caught a nice one:
the md-naming marker is a biconditional, so quoting the literal removal string
in a non-TODO file fails the gate. The gate was right; the text is rephrased.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
