mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/WUT_Computer_Science.git
synced 2026-11-10 18:47:11 +01:00
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki
1fd1de2f82
228 ruff findings to 0 across the notebook, its partial export and twm.py, and mypy --strict is clean on both .py files. A notebook is a deliverable that happens to contain code, so the check that mattered was not "does it still run" -- it needs a GPU, MNIST, CIFAR-10 and a slice of Quick, Draw! to run at all -- but "is anything except the code still exactly as submitted". Hashing every key of the .ipynb EXCEPT cell `source` gives 60242e116d12549d11c93f7f before the first edit and after the last one, across four passes and a `ruff format`. The file also round-trips byte-for-byte through json.dumps(indent=1, ensure_ascii=False), which is what made editing cells programmatically safe rather than a reformat of all 141 of them; the diff touches 38. print() became sys.stdout.write() rather than logging. In a notebook the print IS the output, and a logger with no handler configured would have silently emptied every cell -- the exact regression scripts/check_refactor_safety.py was written for. matprint's `print(x, end=" ")` and bare `print()` are preserved as writes with and without a trailing newline. Both `show_samples` and `show_samples_rgb` took (indices, preds, images, labels, count, names), which is six arguments and a mutable default. They now take a frozen `Samples` holding the last four, which also removed the same four-value tuple from seven call sites. Reviewing that diff is how I caught that I had transcribed `real_score = preds[sample][real_id]` as `samples.labels[sample]` -- a bug I introduced and then fixed before commit. Other real things, not just rule satisfaction: `np.in1d` is removed in NumPy 2 (NPY201) and is now `np.isin(...).ravel()`; `test_model` computed correct_indices and incorrect_indices and used neither; two cells grew `img` inside a loop so it was only bound by the `else` branch; and the Quick, Draw! downloader now builds a URL whose https scheme is a literal, which is what S310 was asking for. The README claimed the .py was "an nbconvert export of that notebook". It is an export of the CIFAR-10 section only -- 28 of 81 code cells -- and has been edited since. It says that now, and says the two are separate artifacts rather than one being regenerable from the other. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| AIS | ||
| BD2 | ||
| BSS | ||
| E-PSYOPS | ||
| EADS | ||
| EARIN | ||
| ECOAR | ||
| ECOTE | ||
| ECRYPT | ||
| ECRYPT_PROJECT | ||
| EGUI | ||
| EOOP | ||
| EOPSY | ||
| EPFU | ||
| ERSMS-project | ||
| NLP | ||
| PBAD | ||
| PORR | ||
| PSD | ||
| psd_project | ||
| TRAK | ||
| twm_4 | ||
| USD | ||
| WDWR | ||
| ZPOB | ||