mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/WUT_Computer_Science.git
synced 2026-11-11 00:27:08 +01:00
The 250-line cap applies to prose too, and the reports were the worst
offenders -- ENUME's projectA.tex alone was 1,876 lines. Each is now a
preamble plus one \input{} per section, which is how a long LaTeX document is
normally organised; not one byte of prose was rewritten.
"The PDF is unchanged" is checked by a script rather than by eye, because
hashing the PDF cannot work: pdflatex stamps a /CreationDate and an /ID into
every build, so two runs of the SAME source already differ. tex_fingerprint.sh
compares what a reader sees instead -- page count plus a hash of the extracted
text -- and it is stable across rebuilds of untouched sources, which is the
property that makes it usable as a gate.
It earned its keep immediately. Both ECOTE reports quote an example LaTeX
document inside an lstlisting block, so \end{document} appears in the middle
of the file; splitting on the FIRST one stranded everything after it. Same
page count, different text, caught automatically. EOPSY lab3 exposed a second
bug: a \section{} title that runs onto the next line.
Result: 19 .tex over the cap -> 1. The survivor,
ELAC/.../03-building-nfa-...tex, is 418 lines of consecutive tikz figures
with no subsection to split on and needs a hand-placed boundary.
Verified: 29 splits across two passes (section, then subsection for the
pieces still over), every one reporting `unchanged` from
scripts/tex_fingerprint.sh --check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 05-results | ||
| 10-task-2 | ||
| 11-task-3 | ||
| 01-a-false-position-method.tex | ||
| 02-b-the-newton-s-method.tex | ||
| 03-problem.tex | ||
| 04-theoretical-introduction.tex | ||
| 05-results.tex | ||
| 06-problem.tex | ||
| 07-theoretical-introduction.tex | ||
| 08-results.tex | ||
| 09-task-1.tex | ||
| 10-task-2.tex | ||
| 11-task-3.tex | ||