mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/WUT_Computer_Science.git
synced 2026-11-11 17:53:54 +01:00
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki
ffa5dad02a
The 250-line cap applies to prose too, and the reports were the worst
offenders -- ENUME's projectA.tex alone was 1,876 lines. Each is now a
preamble plus one \input{} per section, which is how a long LaTeX document is
normally organised; not one byte of prose was rewritten.
"The PDF is unchanged" is checked by a script rather than by eye, because
hashing the PDF cannot work: pdflatex stamps a /CreationDate and an /ID into
every build, so two runs of the SAME source already differ. tex_fingerprint.sh
compares what a reader sees instead -- page count plus a hash of the extracted
text -- and it is stable across rebuilds of untouched sources, which is the
property that makes it usable as a gate.
It earned its keep immediately. Both ECOTE reports quote an example LaTeX
document inside an lstlisting block, so \end{document} appears in the middle
of the file; splitting on the FIRST one stranded everything after it. Same
page count, different text, caught automatically. EOPSY lab3 exposed a second
bug: a \section{} title that runs onto the next line.
Result: 19 .tex over the cap -> 1. The survivor,
ELAC/.../03-building-nfa-...tex, is 418 lines of consecutive tikz figures
with no subsection to split on and needs a hand-placed boundary.
Verified: 29 splits across two passes (section, then subsection for the
pieces still over), every one reporting `unchanged` from
scripts/tex_fingerprint.sh --check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
31 lines
1.1 KiB
TeX
31 lines
1.1 KiB
TeX
\section{Getting process to be blocked 4 times}
|
|
Up untill now process got blocked for maximum of 3 times. This makes sense since
|
|
since they get blocked every 500 ms and the runtime for single process is 2000
|
|
ms, so they get blocked first time at 500 ms, second time at 1000 ms and third
|
|
time at 1500 ms, at 2000 ms they finish execution so they do not get blocked. \\
|
|
If we change runtime of process to 2001 ms we should get as the result them
|
|
getting blocked 4 times! \\
|
|
I changed meandev in scheduling.conf to 2001 and observed results:
|
|
\subsection{Summary Results file}
|
|
\begin{lstlisting}
|
|
Scheduling Type: Batch (Nonpreemptive)
|
|
Scheduling Name: First-Come First-Served
|
|
Simulation Run Time: 6003
|
|
Mean: 2001
|
|
Standard Deviation: 0
|
|
\end{lstlisting}
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\begin{tabular}{| c | c | c | c | c |}
|
|
\hline
|
|
Process \#& CPU Time& IO Blocking& CPU Completed&
|
|
CPU Blocked \\ \hline
|
|
0 & 2001 (ms)& 500 (ms)& 2001 (ms)&
|
|
4 times \\ \hline
|
|
1 & 2001 (ms)& 500 (ms)& 2001 (ms)&
|
|
4 times \\ \hline
|
|
2 & 2001 (ms)& 500 (ms)& 2001 (ms)&
|
|
4 times \\ \hline
|
|
\end{tabular}
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
Sure enough we got all of the processes blocked 4 times!
|