mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/WUT_Computer_Science.git
synced 2026-11-10 21:07:09 +01:00
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki
ffa5dad02a
The 250-line cap applies to prose too, and the reports were the worst
offenders -- ENUME's projectA.tex alone was 1,876 lines. Each is now a
preamble plus one \input{} per section, which is how a long LaTeX document is
normally organised; not one byte of prose was rewritten.
"The PDF is unchanged" is checked by a script rather than by eye, because
hashing the PDF cannot work: pdflatex stamps a /CreationDate and an /ID into
every build, so two runs of the SAME source already differ. tex_fingerprint.sh
compares what a reader sees instead -- page count plus a hash of the extracted
text -- and it is stable across rebuilds of untouched sources, which is the
property that makes it usable as a gate.
It earned its keep immediately. Both ECOTE reports quote an example LaTeX
document inside an lstlisting block, so \end{document} appears in the middle
of the file; splitting on the FIRST one stranded everything after it. Same
page count, different text, caught automatically. EOPSY lab3 exposed a second
bug: a \section{} title that runs onto the next line.
Result: 19 .tex over the cap -> 1. The survivor,
ELAC/.../03-building-nfa-...tex, is 418 lines of consecutive tikz figures
with no subsection to split on and needs a hand-placed boundary.
Verified: 29 splits across two passes (section, then subsection for the
pieces still over), every one reporting `unchanged` from
scripts/tex_fingerprint.sh --check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
14 lines
682 B
TeX
14 lines
682 B
TeX
\section{Parametry}
|
|
z - stan początkowy \\
|
|
S - zakupione surowce (S = \{S1, S2\}) \\
|
|
G1 - surowiec S1 załadowany do wagonów \\
|
|
P - surowce w przygotowywalni (P = \{P1, P2\}) \\
|
|
O2 - surowiec S2 w zakładzie obróbki cieplnej \\
|
|
D - półprodukty (D = \{D1, D2\}) \\
|
|
W - wyroby (W = \{W1, W2\}) \\
|
|
N - stany surowców/półproduktów/wyrobów (zakupione surowce, surowce w przechowalni, surowce w zakładzie obróbki cieplnej, półprodukty, wyroby) \\
|
|
$r_w$ - cena sprzedaży wyrobu $w[\frac{1}{t}]$ \\
|
|
$u_{ij}$ - przepustowośc przepływu ze stanu i do stanu j[t] \\
|
|
$m_{pd}$ - mnożnik definiujący przepływ ze stanu 'surowiec w przygotowalni p' do stanu 'półprodukt d'
|
|
|