mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/WUT_Computer_Science.git
synced 2026-11-10 19:07:11 +01:00
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki
ffa5dad02a
The 250-line cap applies to prose too, and the reports were the worst
offenders -- ENUME's projectA.tex alone was 1,876 lines. Each is now a
preamble plus one \input{} per section, which is how a long LaTeX document is
normally organised; not one byte of prose was rewritten.
"The PDF is unchanged" is checked by a script rather than by eye, because
hashing the PDF cannot work: pdflatex stamps a /CreationDate and an /ID into
every build, so two runs of the SAME source already differ. tex_fingerprint.sh
compares what a reader sees instead -- page count plus a hash of the extracted
text -- and it is stable across rebuilds of untouched sources, which is the
property that makes it usable as a gate.
It earned its keep immediately. Both ECOTE reports quote an example LaTeX
document inside an lstlisting block, so \end{document} appears in the middle
of the file; splitting on the FIRST one stranded everything after it. Same
page count, different text, caught automatically. EOPSY lab3 exposed a second
bug: a \section{} title that runs onto the next line.
Result: 19 .tex over the cap -> 1. The survivor,
ELAC/.../03-building-nfa-...tex, is 418 lines of consecutive tikz figures
with no subsection to split on and needs a hand-placed boundary.
Verified: 29 splits across two passes (section, then subsection for the
pieces still over), every one reporting `unchanged` from
scripts/tex_fingerprint.sh --check.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0172dj34FDpao6wsix8ZuCzE
9 lines
253 B
TeX
9 lines
253 B
TeX
\section{Funkcja celu}
|
|
\begin{align*}
|
|
Q &= max[Zysk - Koszt] \\
|
|
&= max[\sum_{i \in N, w \in W} r_w + f_{iw} \\
|
|
&- (19f_{zS1} - 5a_1 - 4a_2 + 11f_{zS2} + 2b_1 + 2b_2 \\
|
|
&+ 1290c_{P1} + 1500e_{P2} +1500e_{O2} + 160l + 10000g_1 + 40000g_2)]
|
|
\end{align*}
|
|
|