mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/diet-guard.git
synced 2026-11-12 08:30:51 +01:00
b621ccaed0
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b621ccaed0 |
Use gatelock's shared button and WidgetGroup
Phase 2 consumer migration. diet-guard was the donor for make_button, so it
is one of the two proof consumers the extraction is validated against.
- _gatelock_buttons.py is deleted; its make_button now lives in gatelock,
where the variant API (text colour picked *from* the fill) and the
<Return>/<KP_Enter> bindings serve all four gates instead of one. Call
sites pass _COLORS explicitly, since a shared widget cannot read this
app's module-level palette. Pixel-identical: BODY/LABEL were -16/-14 and
LockConfig.font("body"/"label") yields the same negative (pixel) sizes.
- WidgetGroup now subclasses gatelock's, keeping the list[_W] constructor and
re-narrowing `first` to the widget type. The specialized groups (EntryGroup
over a shared StringVar, TextGroup, ListboxGroup, MacroGroup) are unchanged
behaviour and stay -- gatelock has no equivalent for them.
- bind() keeps *replacing* semantics, inverted from gatelock's additive
default and now documented + tested. _wire_events runs once per
build_surface and again on rebuild, so an additive bind would stack a
second <Return> handler on every surviving widget and log the meal twice.
- conftest swaps gatelock.widgets into the fake-tk module list in the same
edit that removes _gatelock_buttons, since that list fails the whole suite
if it drifts in either direction.
All three gatelock pins move together to v0.5.0 -- pyproject, requirements.txt
and the pylint hook's additional_dependencies. The config comment already
warned that a lagging hook pin lints against a gatelock without the API the
code calls; that is exactly what it did before this bump.
The "<Return> activates a button" test moves to gatelock with the button, so
it runs against real Tk rather than a fake widget that can only report the
binding it was handed.
Verified: 692 tests, 100% branch coverage against the *installed* gatelock
0.5.0 (not a PYTHONPATH shim); the gate builds under xvfb and <Return> and
<KP_Enter> both fire a real button's command, with the accent focus ring
(#B8862E, 2px) instead of Tk's invisible 1px black.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01U4Rj3s7K2qzrLNgJqqPhno
|
|||
| e07284d3e1 |
Show weekly and monthly average intake on both devices
The calendar already said which individual days went over budget, but not whether the week as a whole did. A run of small overages reads as four harmless yellow squares; averaged, it is the thing that actually moves the needle. Three rules are load-bearing, and are documented in CLAUDE.md because getting any of them wrong silently changes what "under budget" means: - The denominator is logged days, not elapsed days. An unlogged day is not a zero-kcal day, and averaging gaps in as zeros would make a badly-tracked week look like the best week of the year. - The yardstick is the mean of the per-day budgets over those same days, resolved through BudgetSchedule -- never today's budget, which would retroactively reclassify past weeks on every budget edit. - Today is excluded. A half-logged today drags the mean far enough to flip the band, so every period ends at yesterday. Band boundaries reuse the calendar's own OVER_BUDGET_YELLOW_CEILING by import rather than by copy, so a period and its days can never disagree about what "over" means; that constant loses its underscore to say so. The MCP get_averages tool returns the average and the band but drops the average budget, keeping the module's existing invariant that the budget number never leaves this machine. The CLI, the gate and the phone all show both, since it is hidden from the network, not from the user. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DjJqpcEsaV5WRhPXyxCThd |
|||
| 84bd550331 |
Migrate diet_guard to gatelock v0.2.0 per-output locking
The gate is laid out once per live output instead of once on the primary, and claims the screen through an Arbiter at RANK_DIET_GUARD so the wake alarm and the workout locker can both outrank it. Three kinds of state needed three different answers. The display fields already fanned out for free -- GateVars holds root-mastered StringVars bound to labels. The typed-in fields did not: amount, per, meal name and the four macro cells were bare tk.Entry widgets, so N copies would have been N independent forms. They are variable-backed now, which is what makes logging work from whichever screen the user is actually looking at. The description box and the suggestion list cannot be shared at all -- tk.Text and tk.Listbox have no variable -- so those genuinely diverge and reads answer from the copy the user touched. The History tab is per-surface too: its grid, budget field and edit button are driven across every monitor, with the budget likewise variable-backed so the value cannot differ between screens mid-edit. Laying the gate out on the primary monitor only was considered and rejected: not having to hunt for the screen the form landed on is the entire point of per-output locking. Tests: the suite hung rather than failed on first run -- diet_guard patches its own `tk`, but LockWindow builds Toplevels through gatelock's, and real tkinter over a MagicMock root recurses without bound. `_hermetic_gatelock` closes that and redirects the runtime dir so no test can stand a production locker down. Every other test runs single-output, where fan-out is unobservable, so test_gatelock_fanout runs on two; each assertion was checked by cropping the fan-out loops to the first surface and confirming it goes red. _gatelock_ui and _gatelock_calendar were each split in two to stay under the 500-line limit, and GateVars' typed-in fields moved into a nested GateEntryVars rather than raising pylint's attribute cap. 470 tests, 100% branch coverage, pre-commit clean, no lint suppressions. |
