diet-guard/diet_guard/_kuchnia_errors.py
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki 26f1770090 feat: import Kuchnia Wikinga catering deliveries into the food bank
Pulls the day's delivered dishes and their real per-portion macros out of
panel.kuchniavikinga.pl, so a catering meal is one keypress instead of five
retyped numbers.

A delivered meal is not an eaten meal, so nothing is ever logged unattended:
dishes land in the *curated* bank, and entries are written only after an
explicit confirmation. Auto-logging would let the gate satisfy its own
checkpoint from a delivery note, and would record what the courier dropped off
rather than what was eaten.

Three surfaces:
  - `diet-guard kuchnia [--log] [--yes]`
  - the lock screen's "Today's delivery" button, which prefills the meal form
    dish by dish (the user still clicks Log & Continue)
  - a warm-up after each logged meal, on the existing background thread

All event-driven; no new systemd timer. The two automatic paths go through
`refresh_delivery_once`, guarded to one fetch per day.

The panel is an undocumented white-labelled Dietly API; the endpoint map was
recovered from its JS bundles and confirmed against live responses. Notes,
including the traps, are in docs/kuchnia-wikinga.md.

Load-bearing details:

* Macros are per portion and `weight` is that portion in grams -- proven, not
  assumed: 4P+4C+9F reproduces the stated calories within ~1% on every meal of
  the captured day. `_energy_is_consistent` re-runs that check per dish and
  drops any that fails; a per-100g mix-up is invisible in a payload and would
  silently skew every logged meal by a factor of several.
* `bank_dishes` compares nutritional fields before calling `add_manual_entry`,
  which restamps `t` unconditionally. Without the compare, every refresh
  republishes the whole curated bank to every peer. Tests assert on call count.
* Duplicate log suppression reads today's synced log, not a local marker:
  `log_meal` mints a fresh uuid, so a re-import after marker loss would merge
  as duplicates on every peer.
* The gate hook is in `on_focus_ready`, not `_cli_gate._should_lock`:
  `gate_is_due()` never reads the food bank, so a refresh there could not
  change the lock decision while adding a third-party round trip to the ~105ms
  `gate --check` fast path.
* `requests` is lazy-imported so the gate's not-due tick does not pay for it.
* Credentials and the cached session cookie live in ~/.config/diet_guard at
  mode 600, outside the synced tree. The credentials file is written by hand,
  never by the package -- the same contract as sync_token.

`_GateDashboard` is merged into `_GateMealFlow`, and both "pull it in from
elsewhere" flows share one `_PullFlows` mixin: pylint's max-parents counts
every MRO entry, so the gate's controller chain had no room for a new class.

Also adds a side-by-side row for the two pull buttons -- stacking them cost
42px and pushed the tab past the viewport at 1366x768.

989 tests, 100% branch coverage, pre-commit clean.
2026-08-22 23:04:22 +02:00

19 lines
719 B
Python

"""The one exception the Kuchnia Wikinga importer raises.
Its own module so :mod:`diet_guard._kuchnia_client`, which raises it, and the
callers that catch it do not have to import each other -- the same shape as
:mod:`diet_guard._sync_errors`.
Deliberately a single class rather than a hierarchy. Every failure mode here
(no credentials, login rejected, a non-200, an unparsable body, a blown
deadline) is handled identically by every caller: report the reason and carry
on without the catering data. A richer taxonomy would cost branch-coverage
tests for a distinction nothing acts on.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
class KuchniaError(Exception):
"""Raised when the catering panel cannot be read."""