mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/diet-guard.git
synced 2026-11-11 12:07:42 +01:00
Sixth batch of the 250-line sweep. All six gate sources named for this batch are now under cap, plus _gate_layout_probe.py, which this batch's import rewiring pulled into the changeset (over-cap count 38 -> 31). _gatelock_ui.py 477 -> 174 (palette/leaf-helper hub) _gate_layout_probe.py 346 -> 196 _gatelock_groups.py 308 -> 137 _gatelock_calendar_ui 295 -> 77 _gatelock_calendar.py 286 -> 210 _gatelock.py 263 -> 238 _gatelock_mealflow.py 259 -> 207 New siblings: _gatelock_fields (input widgets), _gatelock_layout (assembly), _gatelock_widgetgroups (per-widget mirroring), _gatelock_calendar_types (bundles/palette), _gatelock_calendar_widgets (History builders), _gatelock_dashboard and _gatelock_budgetedit (mixins), _gatelock_lockfile (the stdlib-only flock), _gate_focus_probe and _gate_measurement. The load-bearing part is the test seam, not the line counts. `_gate_fixtures._GATE_TK_MODULES` patches `tk` on a hand-listed tuple, and that list fails OPEN: a widget builder split into a new sibling that nobody adds to it builds *real* Tk widgets against fake parents. Neither existing detector sees that -- check_patch_targets.py only validates paths that still resolve, and the ~8s runtime only catches network calls. It bit twice during this split (real StringVars from make_calendar_vars returned MagicMocks instead of the asserted text), so test_gate_tk_modules.py now asserts the invariant directly: every module binding `tk` is in the patch set or named in _NO_WIDGETS with a reason. It caught a pre-existing gap too -- _gatelock_support was never in the set. Same fail-open shape drove two other choices: `escape_tab_trap` is a call-time indirection so the keyboard test's patch of `_escape_text_tab_trap` still bites, and the flock pair moved with its conftest patch target updated in the same edit (that one fails closed). build_layout is imported from _gatelock_layout directly rather than re-exported lazily, which avoids both a cycle and an import-outside-toplevel suppression. Verified: 703 Python tests / 100% branch coverage, the 5 layout-fits tests under xvfb, 555 Flutter tests (unchanged), flutter analyze clean, check_patch_targets 0, `sync` 0 (403 entries), pre-commit clean, and `gate --demo` renders both tabs with live dashboard data. ~/.local/share/diet_guard byte-identical across the batch (gate timer paused, restored after). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RA9ynjqXPnexRQnR5oAuCC
118 lines
4.5 KiB
Python
118 lines
4.5 KiB
Python
"""Budget editing on the gate's History tab.
|
|
|
|
Split out of :mod:`._gatelock_calendar` to keep every gate module under the
|
|
repo's 250-line limit. ``_GateBudgetEdit`` sits between
|
|
:class:`~diet_guard._gatelock_mealflow._GateMealFlow` and
|
|
:class:`~diet_guard._gatelock_calendar._GateCalendar` in the mixin chain and
|
|
owns the one place either device edits the daily budget.
|
|
|
|
The budget is a plain, freely-editable synced file -- no seal, no signing.
|
|
That is deliberate (it replaced a ``chattr +i`` mechanism so the value is
|
|
editable from either device); do not reintroduce the seal here.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import abc
|
|
import contextlib
|
|
import tkinter as tk
|
|
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
|
|
|
|
from diet_guard._budget import BudgetError, budget_weight, write_budget
|
|
from diet_guard._gatelock_mealflow import _GateMealFlow
|
|
from diet_guard._gatelock_ui import ERR, FG
|
|
|
|
if TYPE_CHECKING:
|
|
from diet_guard._gatelock_calendar_types import CalendarVars, CalendarWidgets
|
|
|
|
__all__ = ["_GateBudgetEdit"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
class _GateBudgetEdit(_GateMealFlow):
|
|
"""The History tab's budget row: display, edit toggle, validate, persist.
|
|
|
|
The calendar state below is *declared* here and **created** by
|
|
:class:`~diet_guard._gatelock_calendar._GateCalendar`, further down the
|
|
mixin chain: this half only reads and writes the budget row, while the
|
|
other owns the tab's construction and refresh. Declaring the attributes
|
|
keeps that split checkable rather than implicit.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
_cal_vars: CalendarVars
|
|
_cal_surfaces: list[CalendarWidgets]
|
|
_cal_editing_budget: bool
|
|
|
|
@abc.abstractmethod
|
|
def _refresh_calendar(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Repaint the History tab; implemented by ``_GateCalendar``."""
|
|
|
|
def _set_budget_entry_state(self, state: str) -> None:
|
|
"""Lock or unlock the budget entry on every monitor."""
|
|
for surface in self._cal_surfaces:
|
|
with contextlib.suppress(tk.TclError):
|
|
surface.budget_entry.config(state=state)
|
|
|
|
def _set_budget_button_text(self, text: str) -> None:
|
|
"""Relabel the budget edit/save button on every monitor."""
|
|
for surface in self._cal_surfaces:
|
|
with contextlib.suppress(tk.TclError):
|
|
surface.budget_edit_button.config(text=text)
|
|
|
|
def _set_budget_status(self, text: str, *, error: bool) -> None:
|
|
"""Update the budget-edit status line, red for errors."""
|
|
self._cal_vars.budget_status.set(text)
|
|
colour = ERR if error else FG
|
|
for surface in self._cal_surfaces:
|
|
with contextlib.suppress(tk.TclError):
|
|
surface.budget_status_label.config(fg=colour)
|
|
|
|
def _on_edit_or_save_budget(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Toggle the budget row between read-only display and editing.
|
|
|
|
First click: unlock the entry for typing and relabel the button
|
|
"Save" -- nothing is persisted yet. Second click: validate and
|
|
persist; on success, lock the entry back to read-only and relabel
|
|
the button "Edit". A validation failure leaves editing open so the
|
|
user can correct the value instead of silently discarding it.
|
|
"""
|
|
if not self._cal_editing_budget:
|
|
self._cal_editing_budget = True
|
|
self._set_budget_entry_state("normal")
|
|
self._set_budget_button_text("Save")
|
|
self._set_budget_status("", error=False)
|
|
return
|
|
if not self._save_budget_entry():
|
|
return
|
|
self._cal_editing_budget = False
|
|
self._set_budget_button_text("Edit")
|
|
self._refresh_calendar()
|
|
self._refresh_dashboard()
|
|
self._refresh_projection()
|
|
|
|
def _save_budget_entry(self) -> bool:
|
|
"""Validate and persist the entry's current text.
|
|
|
|
Preserves any body weight already stored alongside the budget (used
|
|
to derive the protein target) -- a bare ``write_budget(value)`` would
|
|
silently drop it, since the file holds one record, not a diff.
|
|
|
|
Returns:
|
|
Whether the value was valid and persisted.
|
|
"""
|
|
raw = self._cal_vars.budget.get().strip()
|
|
try:
|
|
value = int(raw)
|
|
except ValueError:
|
|
self._set_budget_status("Enter a whole number of kcal.", error=True)
|
|
return False
|
|
if value <= 0:
|
|
self._set_budget_status("Budget must be a positive number.", error=True)
|
|
return False
|
|
try:
|
|
weight = budget_weight()
|
|
except BudgetError:
|
|
weight = None
|
|
write_budget(value, weight_kg=weight)
|
|
self._set_budget_status("Saved.", error=False)
|
|
return True
|