diff --git a/screen_locker/_constants.py b/screen_locker/_constants.py
index 2676443..514b95f 100644
--- a/screen_locker/_constants.py
+++ b/screen_locker/_constants.py
@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ RUNNERUP_PACKAGES = ("org.runnerup", "org.runnerup.free")
 RUNNERUP_DB_SDCARD_TMP = "/sdcard/.runnerup_tmp_verification.db"
 MIN_RUN_DURATION_MINUTES = 30
 MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM = 5.0
+# GPS distance tracking undershoots on tight turns/tree cover/urban canyons;
+# a run within 5% of the minimum is accepted rather than rejected on
+# measurement noise. Duration comes from the device clock, not GPS, so it
+# gets no such leeway.
+RUNNERUP_DISTANCE_TOLERANCE = 0.05
 RUNNERUP_ACCEPTED_SPORTS: frozenset[int] = frozenset({0, 3, 5})
 # 0=RUNNING, 3=ORIENTEERING, 5=TREADMILL
 MAX_CLOCK_SKEW_SECONDS = 300  # 5 minutes max time skew from NTP
diff --git a/screen_locker/_phone_verification.py b/screen_locker/_phone_verification.py
index bfb890a..0558d8b 100644
--- a/screen_locker/_phone_verification.py
+++ b/screen_locker/_phone_verification.py
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ from concurrent.futures import (  # pylint: disable=no-name-in-module
     as_completed,
 )
 import contextlib
+from datetime import date, datetime, timedelta, timezone
 from http import client as _http_client
 import json
 import logging
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ from screen_locker._constants import (
     WORKOUT_APP_JSON_REMOTES,
     WORKOUT_HTTP_PORT,
 )
+from screen_locker._log_mixin import write_signed_entry
 from screen_locker._time_check import check_clock_skew
 from screen_locker._workout_sync import pull_synced_workout
 
@@ -175,13 +177,15 @@ class PhoneVerificationMixin:
                 first_parsed = data
         return first_parsed
 
-    def _validate_json_data(self, data: dict) -> tuple[str, str]:
-        """Validate parsed workout JSON. Returns (status, message)."""
-        today = time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d")
-        if data.get("date") != today:
-            return "stale", f"Workout JSON is from {data.get('date')}, not today"
+    def _validate_json_content(self, data: dict) -> tuple[str, str]:
+        """Validate a workout JSON's exercises/duration, regardless of its date.
+
+        Split out of :meth:`_validate_json_data` so the week-scan backfill
+        (``_try_fill_stronglifts_for_week``) can reuse the same content
+        checks against a past-in-week date without the today-only gate.
+        """
         if not data.get("exercises"):
-            return "no_exercises", "No exercises found in today's workout JSON"
+            return "no_exercises", "No exercises found in the workout JSON"
         duration_min = data.get("duration_seconds", 0) / 60.0
         if duration_min < MIN_WORKOUT_DURATION_MINUTES:
             return (
@@ -192,6 +196,63 @@ class PhoneVerificationMixin:
         flag = "all succeeded" if data.get("succeeded") else "partial"
         return "verified", f"Workout verified! ({duration_min:.0f} min, {flag})"
 
+    def _validate_json_data(self, data: dict) -> tuple[str, str]:
+        """Validate parsed workout JSON. Returns (status, message).
+
+        Requires today's date — this is the live unlock-chain check, which
+        must reflect a workout done *right now*. For crediting a workout
+        found dated earlier in the week, see ``_try_fill_stronglifts_for_week``.
+        """
+        today = time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d")
+        if data.get("date") != today:
+            return "stale", f"Workout JSON is from {data.get('date')}, not today"
+        return self._validate_json_content(data)
+
+    def _try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(self, log_file: Path) -> int:
+        """Backfill a past-this-week StrongLifts workout found on the phone.
+
+        Unlike RunnerUp's per-activity TCX exports, the phone holds only one
+        ``workout_result.json`` snapshot at a time, so this fills at most one
+        day per call — that mirrors :meth:`_scan_and_fill_week_runnerup`'s
+        contract (0 when nothing new to fill) without pretending there could
+        be more than one candidate. Still pulls and validates the real file
+        via ADB before writing anything — never trusts a claim.
+
+        Returns 1 if a new verified entry was appended, else 0 (also 0 when
+        no phone is connected, no JSON is available, or its date falls
+        outside the current ISO week).
+        """
+        if not self._has_adb_device():
+            _logger.info(
+                "Phone not connected; skipping StrongLifts week-scan backfill."
+            )
+            return 0
+        data = self._pull_workout_app_json()
+        date_str = data.get("date") if data else None
+        if not date_str:
+            return 0
+        today = datetime.now(tz=timezone.utc).astimezone().date()
+        week_start = today - timedelta(days=today.weekday())
+        try:
+            entry_date = date.fromisoformat(date_str)
+        except ValueError:
+            _logger.warning("StrongLifts JSON has an unparsable date: %r", date_str)
+            return 0
+        if not week_start <= entry_date <= today:
+            return 0
+        status, msg = self._validate_json_content(data)
+        if status != "verified":
+            return 0
+        workout_data = {
+            "type": "phone_verified",
+            "source": f"Auto-scanned: {msg}",
+            "duration_minutes": round(data.get("duration_seconds", 0) / 60.0, 1),
+        }
+        if write_signed_entry(log_file, date_str, workout_data).appended:
+            _logger.info("Auto-filled StrongLifts entry for %s: %s", date_str, msg)
+            return 1
+        return 0
+
     # ── HTTP fallback (no ADB / developer options required) ───────────────────
 
     def _scan_for_http_server(self) -> str | None:
diff --git a/screen_locker/_runnerup_verification.py b/screen_locker/_runnerup_verification.py
index 52e0a7e..b3e7f1b 100644
--- a/screen_locker/_runnerup_verification.py
+++ b/screen_locker/_runnerup_verification.py
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ from screen_locker._constants import (
     MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM,
     MIN_RUN_DURATION_MINUTES,
     RUNNERUP_ACCEPTED_SPORTS,
+    RUNNERUP_DISTANCE_TOLERANCE,
     RUNNERUP_EXPORT_DIRS,
 )
 from screen_locker._log_mixin import write_signed_entry
@@ -236,9 +237,17 @@ class RunnerUpVerificationMixin(RunnerUpDbMixin):
             return "too_short", msg
 
         distance_km = data["distance_m"] / 1000
-        if distance_km < MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM:
+        if distance_km * (1 + RUNNERUP_DISTANCE_TOLERANCE) < MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM:
             msg = f"Run was {distance_km:.1f} km — need {MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM:.0f}+ km"
             return "too_short", msg
+        if distance_km < MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM:
+            _logger.info(
+                "RunnerUp distance %.2f km is under the %.1f km minimum but "
+                "within %.0f%% GPS tolerance — accepted.",
+                distance_km,
+                MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM,
+                RUNNERUP_DISTANCE_TOLERANCE * 100,
+            )
 
         sport_name = _SPORT_NAMES.get(sport, str(sport))
         return (
diff --git a/screen_locker/_status.py b/screen_locker/_status.py
index 771230d..6b99317 100644
--- a/screen_locker/_status.py
+++ b/screen_locker/_status.py
@@ -81,16 +81,19 @@ def run_status(locker: ScreenLocker) -> None:
     print("=== Weekly Workout Status ===")
 
     # Per-day breakdown
-    before_count = 0
     for i in range(7):
         d = monday + timedelta(days=i)
         if d > today:
             break
-        if _print_day_line(d, log_data.get(d.isoformat(), []), sick_days):
-            before_count += 1
+        _print_day_line(d, log_data.get(d.isoformat(), []), sick_days)
 
     print()
 
+    # The weekly total, per the anti-gaming rule (each verified workout counts
+    # individually, manual counts once/day) — NOT a per-day checkmark count,
+    # which would undercount a day holding two verified workouts.
+    before_count = count_weekly_workouts(log_file)
+
     # RunnerUp scan
     n_filled = locker._scan_and_fill_week_runnerup(log_file)
     if n_filled > 0:
diff --git a/screen_locker/_status_view_verify.py b/screen_locker/_status_view_verify.py
index a318888..b546585 100644
--- a/screen_locker/_status_view_verify.py
+++ b/screen_locker/_status_view_verify.py
@@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ screen's unlock does.
 from __future__ import annotations
 
 from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor  # pylint: disable=no-name-in-module
+from dataclasses import dataclass
 from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
 
 from screen_locker._status_data import gather_status
+from screen_locker._weekly_check import WEEKLY_WORKOUT_MINIMUM, count_weekly_workouts
 
 if TYPE_CHECKING:
     from collections.abc import Callable
@@ -22,6 +24,23 @@ if TYPE_CHECKING:
     from screen_locker.screen_lock import ScreenLocker
 
 
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class PhoneCheckOutcome:
+    """Result of the "Check Phone" button's verify-then-backfill chain.
+
+    ``credited_type`` is ``"phone_verified"`` / ``"runnerup_verified"`` when
+    *today's* workout verified directly, or ``None`` otherwise (whether or
+    not the week-scan backfill found something — that's reported separately
+    via ``week_fill_message``, since it applies its own credit already).
+    """
+
+    credited_type: str | None
+    status: str
+    phone_message: str
+    runnerup_message: str | None
+    week_fill_message: str | None = None
+
+
 def _make_bare_verifier(log_file: Path) -> ScreenLocker:
     """Build a minimal ``ScreenLocker`` for verification calls.
 
@@ -37,29 +56,58 @@ def _make_bare_verifier(log_file: Path) -> ScreenLocker:
     return verifier
 
 
-def _verify_phone_then_runnerup(
-    verifier: ScreenLocker,
-) -> tuple[str | None, str, str, str | None]:
-    """Check StrongLifts first, then RunnerUp as a fallback (worker-thread safe).
+def _backfill_week_and_apply_bonus(verifier: ScreenLocker) -> str | None:
+    """Scan the current week for unlogged RunnerUp/StrongLifts and credit it.
+
+    Reuses the exact prev/new-count + ``_adjust_shutdown_time_by`` bonus
+    pattern already proven by the automatic lock-check
+    (``screen_lock.py:_auto_fill_week_runnerup_bonus``) and the ``--status``
+    CLI (``_status.py``) — deliberately *not* routed through
+    ``_apply_workout_credit``, which always files under today by design and
+    would mis-date a backfilled entry.
+
+    Returns a human-readable summary if anything was filled, else ``None``.
+    """
+    prev_count = count_weekly_workouts(verifier.log_file)
+    filled = verifier._scan_and_fill_week_runnerup(verifier.log_file)
+    filled += verifier._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(verifier.log_file)
+    if not filled:
+        return None
+    new_count = count_weekly_workouts(verifier.log_file)
+    bonus = max(0, new_count - max(WEEKLY_WORKOUT_MINIMUM, prev_count))
+    if bonus > 0:
+        verifier._adjust_shutdown_time_by(bonus)
+    plural = "workout" if filled == 1 else "workouts"
+    message = f"Auto-filled {filled} {plural} from earlier this week."
+    if bonus > 0:
+        message += f" +{bonus}h shutdown time."
+    return message
+
+
+def _verify_phone_then_runnerup(verifier: ScreenLocker) -> PhoneCheckOutcome:
+    """Check StrongLifts first, then RunnerUp, then backfill the rest of the week.
 
     Mirrors the locked screen's StrongLifts→RunnerUp chain (``_ui_flows.py``):
     a user may have run instead of lifted, so a failed phone check falls back
-    to today's RunnerUp export. Only calls the verifier's ADB methods — never
-    touches Tk — so it is safe to run inside a background thread.
-
-    Returns ``(credited_type, status, phone_message, runnerup_message)`` where
-    ``credited_type`` is ``"phone_verified"`` / ``"runnerup_verified"`` on a
-    verified workout, or ``None`` when neither source verified.
-    ``runnerup_message`` is ``None`` when StrongLifts verified and RunnerUp was
-    never consulted.
+    to today's RunnerUp export. When neither source verifies *today*, this
+    also scans the rest of the current ISO week for an unlogged, already-real
+    (ADB-pulled, TCX/JSON-verified) workout — e.g. a run from yesterday that
+    was never on-screen when the phone wasn't connected yet — and credits it
+    directly. Only calls the verifier's ADB methods — never touches Tk — so
+    it is safe to run inside a background thread.
     """
     phone_status, phone_message = verifier._verify_phone_workout()
     if phone_status == "verified":
-        return "phone_verified", phone_status, phone_message, None
+        return PhoneCheckOutcome("phone_verified", phone_status, phone_message, None)
     runnerup_status, runnerup_message = verifier._verify_runnerup_workout()
     if runnerup_status == "verified":
-        return "runnerup_verified", runnerup_status, phone_message, runnerup_message
-    return None, runnerup_status, phone_message, runnerup_message
+        return PhoneCheckOutcome(
+            "runnerup_verified", runnerup_status, phone_message, runnerup_message
+        )
+    week_fill_message = _backfill_week_and_apply_bonus(verifier)
+    return PhoneCheckOutcome(
+        None, runnerup_status, phone_message, runnerup_message, week_fill_message
+    )
 
 
 class PhoneCheckMixin:
@@ -72,7 +120,7 @@ class PhoneCheckMixin:
 
     log_file: Path
     verifier_factory: Callable[[Path], ScreenLocker]
-    _phone_future: Future[tuple[str | None, str, str, str | None]] | None
+    _phone_future: Future[PhoneCheckOutcome] | None
     _phone_check_result: tuple[str, str] | None
     _credit_message: str | None
 
@@ -82,7 +130,9 @@ class PhoneCheckMixin:
         Runs the two-step check in one background worker so the Tk loop stays
         responsive, then polls the future. Unlike the old display-only probe,
         a verified result here writes the entry and applies the shutdown bonus
-        (see :meth:`_on_phone_check_result`).
+        (see :meth:`_on_phone_check_result`). When neither source verifies
+        today, the same worker also backfills any unlogged workout from
+        earlier this week before giving up.
         """
         self._phone_check_result = None
         self._credit_message = None
@@ -95,44 +145,50 @@ class PhoneCheckMixin:
     def _poll_phone_check(self) -> None:
         """Poll the background verification future until it resolves."""
         if self._phone_future is not None and self._phone_future.done():
-            self._on_phone_check_result(*self._phone_future.result())
+            self._on_phone_check_result(self._phone_future.result())
         else:
             self.root.after(500, self._poll_phone_check)
 
-    def _on_phone_check_result(
-        self,
-        credited_type: str | None,
-        status: str,
-        phone_message: str,
-        runnerup_message: str | None,
-    ) -> None:
+    def _on_phone_check_result(self, outcome: PhoneCheckOutcome) -> None:
         """Apply credit on a verified workout, else show a combined failure.
 
-        On a verified result this writes the entry and applies the reward via
-        ``_apply_workout_credit`` — the same path the locked screen's
-        ``unlock_screen`` and the "Log Manual Workout" button use, guarded
-        against double-crediting on the same day. When neither source verified,
-        it shows both messages so the user knows why nothing counted.
+        On a verified *today* result this writes the entry and applies the
+        reward via ``_apply_workout_credit`` — the same path the locked
+        screen's ``unlock_screen`` and the "Log Manual Workout" button use,
+        guarded against double-crediting on the same day. When the week-scan
+        backfill found something instead (see ``_verify_phone_then_runnerup``),
+        its message is shown as-is — that step already wrote the entry and
+        applied its own bonus, applying credit again here would double it.
+        When nothing verified or filled, both today-check messages are shown
+        so the user knows why nothing counted.
         """
-        if credited_type is not None:
+        if outcome.credited_type is not None:
             message = (
-                runnerup_message
-                if credited_type == "runnerup_verified"
-                else phone_message
+                outcome.runnerup_message
+                if outcome.credited_type == "runnerup_verified"
+                else outcome.phone_message
             )
             source_label = (
-                "RunnerUp" if credited_type == "runnerup_verified" else "StrongLifts"
+                "RunnerUp"
+                if outcome.credited_type == "runnerup_verified"
+                else "StrongLifts"
             )
             verifier = self.verifier_factory(self.log_file)
-            verifier.workout_data = {"type": credited_type, "source": message or ""}
+            verifier.workout_data = {
+                "type": outcome.credited_type,
+                "source": message or "",
+            }
             credit = verifier._apply_workout_credit()
             self._credit_message = "\n".join(
                 self._credit_result_lines(f"{source_label} verified: {message}", credit)
             )
+        elif outcome.week_fill_message is not None:
+            self._credit_message = outcome.week_fill_message
         else:
             self._phone_check_result = (
-                status,
-                f"StrongLifts: {phone_message} · RunnerUp: {runnerup_message}",
+                outcome.status,
+                f"StrongLifts: {outcome.phone_message} · "
+                f"RunnerUp: {outcome.runnerup_message}",
             )
         self.render(gather_status())
 
diff --git a/screen_locker/tests/test_phone_verification_part5.py b/screen_locker/tests/test_phone_verification_part5.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8a4f910
--- /dev/null
+++ b/screen_locker/tests/test_phone_verification_part5.py
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+"""Tests for _try_fill_stronglifts_for_week (StrongLifts week-scan backfill)."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from datetime import date, timedelta
+import json
+from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
+
+from screen_locker.tests.conftest import create_locker
+
+if TYPE_CHECKING:
+    from pathlib import Path
+
+
+class TestTryFillStronglifitsForWeek:
+    """Tests for _try_fill_stronglifts_for_week (week-scan backfill)."""
+
+    def test_returns_zero_when_no_phone(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock, mock_sys_exit: MagicMock, tmp_path: Path
+    ) -> None:
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text("{}")
+        object.__setattr__(locker, "_has_adb_device", MagicMock(return_value=False))
+        assert locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file) == 0
+
+    def test_returns_zero_when_no_json_pulled(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock, mock_sys_exit: MagicMock, tmp_path: Path
+    ) -> None:
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text("{}")
+        object.__setattr__(locker, "_has_adb_device", MagicMock(return_value=True))
+        object.__setattr__(
+            locker, "_pull_workout_app_json", MagicMock(return_value=None)
+        )
+        assert locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file) == 0
+
+    def test_returns_zero_when_date_unparsable(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock, mock_sys_exit: MagicMock, tmp_path: Path
+    ) -> None:
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text("{}")
+        object.__setattr__(locker, "_has_adb_device", MagicMock(return_value=True))
+        object.__setattr__(
+            locker,
+            "_pull_workout_app_json",
+            MagicMock(return_value={"date": "not-a-date", "exercises": ["x"]}),
+        )
+        assert locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file) == 0
+
+    def test_returns_zero_when_date_outside_current_week(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock, mock_sys_exit: MagicMock, tmp_path: Path
+    ) -> None:
+        """A stale JSON from before this ISO week is not backfilled."""
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text("{}")
+        last_week = (date.today() - timedelta(days=8)).isoformat()
+        object.__setattr__(locker, "_has_adb_device", MagicMock(return_value=True))
+        object.__setattr__(
+            locker,
+            "_pull_workout_app_json",
+            MagicMock(
+                return_value={
+                    "date": last_week,
+                    "exercises": ["x"],
+                    "duration_seconds": 6000,
+                    "succeeded": True,
+                }
+            ),
+        )
+        assert locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file) == 0
+
+    def test_returns_zero_when_content_invalid(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock, mock_sys_exit: MagicMock, tmp_path: Path
+    ) -> None:
+        """A this-week date with no exercises still fails content validation."""
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text("{}")
+        yesterday = (date.today() - timedelta(days=1)).isoformat()
+        object.__setattr__(locker, "_has_adb_device", MagicMock(return_value=True))
+        object.__setattr__(
+            locker,
+            "_pull_workout_app_json",
+            MagicMock(return_value={"date": yesterday, "exercises": []}),
+        )
+        assert locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file) == 0
+
+    def test_fills_gap_for_past_week_day(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock, mock_sys_exit: MagicMock, tmp_path: Path
+    ) -> None:
+        """A valid, this-week, not-yet-logged JSON gets appended and returns 1."""
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text("{}")
+        yesterday = (date.today() - timedelta(days=1)).isoformat()
+        object.__setattr__(locker, "_has_adb_device", MagicMock(return_value=True))
+        object.__setattr__(
+            locker,
+            "_pull_workout_app_json",
+            MagicMock(
+                return_value={
+                    "date": yesterday,
+                    "exercises": ["x"],
+                    "duration_seconds": 6000,
+                    "succeeded": True,
+                }
+            ),
+        )
+
+        with patch("screen_locker._log_mixin.compute_entry_hmac", return_value="sig"):
+            result = locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file)
+
+        assert result == 1
+        logs = json.loads(log_file.read_text())
+        entry = logs[yesterday][0]
+        assert entry["workout_data"]["type"] == "phone_verified"
+        assert entry["workout_id"] == f"phone_verified:{yesterday}"
+
+    def test_rescanning_an_already_filled_day_is_a_no_op(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock, mock_sys_exit: MagicMock, tmp_path: Path
+    ) -> None:
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text("{}")
+        yesterday = (date.today() - timedelta(days=1)).isoformat()
+        data = {
+            "date": yesterday,
+            "exercises": ["x"],
+            "duration_seconds": 6000,
+            "succeeded": True,
+        }
+        object.__setattr__(locker, "_has_adb_device", MagicMock(return_value=True))
+        object.__setattr__(
+            locker, "_pull_workout_app_json", MagicMock(return_value=data)
+        )
+
+        with patch("screen_locker._log_mixin.compute_entry_hmac", return_value="sig"):
+            first = locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file)
+            second = locker._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week(log_file)
+
+        assert (first, second) == (1, 0)
diff --git a/screen_locker/tests/test_runnerup_verification_part2.py b/screen_locker/tests/test_runnerup_verification_part2.py
index ce05e29..5c7939d 100644
--- a/screen_locker/tests/test_runnerup_verification_part2.py
+++ b/screen_locker/tests/test_runnerup_verification_part2.py
@@ -75,6 +75,57 @@ def _write_tcx(tmp_path: Path, content: str, name: str = "activity.tcx") -> str:
     return str(p)
 
 
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# _validate_runnerup_data — GPS distance tolerance
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class TestValidateRunnerupDataDistanceTolerance:
+    """A run just under MIN_RUN_DISTANCE_KM is accepted within 5% GPS tolerance."""
+
+    def test_distance_within_tolerance_is_verified(
+        self,
+        mock_tk: MagicMock,
+        mock_sys_exit: MagicMock,
+        tmp_path: Path,
+    ) -> None:
+        """4.9 km * 1.05 = 5.145 >= 5.0 km minimum → verified."""
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        status, msg = locker._validate_runnerup_data(
+            {"sport": 0, "duration_seconds": 1947, "distance_m": 4929.05}
+        )
+        assert status == "verified"
+        assert "4.9 km" in msg
+
+    def test_distance_below_tolerance_is_too_short(
+        self,
+        mock_tk: MagicMock,
+        mock_sys_exit: MagicMock,
+        tmp_path: Path,
+    ) -> None:
+        """4.0 km * 1.05 = 4.2 km, still short of the 5.0 km minimum → too_short."""
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        status, msg = locker._validate_runnerup_data(
+            {"sport": 0, "duration_seconds": 1947, "distance_m": 4000}
+        )
+        assert status == "too_short"
+        assert "km" in msg
+
+    def test_distance_at_full_minimum_is_verified(
+        self,
+        mock_tk: MagicMock,
+        mock_sys_exit: MagicMock,
+        tmp_path: Path,
+    ) -> None:
+        """A run already meeting the minimum outright still passes (tolerance is
+        additive leeway, not a stricter requirement)."""
+        locker = create_locker(mock_tk, tmp_path)
+        status, _ = locker._validate_runnerup_data(
+            {"sport": 0, "duration_seconds": 1947, "distance_m": 5000}
+        )
+        assert status == "verified"
+
+
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # _validate_runnerup_data
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/screen_locker/tests/test_status.py b/screen_locker/tests/test_status.py
index 12f3937..2a0a61f 100644
--- a/screen_locker/tests/test_status.py
+++ b/screen_locker/tests/test_status.py
@@ -242,3 +242,46 @@ class TestRunStatusWorkoutLog:
             run_status(locker)
         out = capsys.readouterr().out
         assert "heat_skip" in out
+
+
+class TestWeeklyTotalUsesPerWorkoutRule:
+    """The final summary must count each verified workout, not days-with-any."""
+
+    def test_multiple_same_day_workouts_all_count(
+        self, tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture
+    ) -> None:
+        """One day with 1 manual + 3 verified entries = 4, not capped at 1.
+
+        Regression test: the summary used to derive its total from a
+        per-day checkmark count (max 1 per day), undercounting any day
+        holding more than one counted workout — exactly what multi-workout
+        days are supposed to support.
+        """
+        from datetime import datetime, timezone
+
+        today = datetime.now(tz=timezone.utc).astimezone().date().isoformat()
+        log_file = tmp_path / "log.json"
+        log_file.write_text(
+            json.dumps(
+                {
+                    today: [
+                        {"workout_data": {"type": "manual_workout", "source": "gym"}},
+                        {"workout_data": {"type": "runnerup_verified", "source": "a"}},
+                        {"workout_data": {"type": "phone_verified", "source": "b"}},
+                        {"workout_data": {"type": "runnerup_verified", "source": "c"}},
+                    ]
+                }
+            )
+        )
+        eb_file = tmp_path / "eb.json"
+        # n_filled=0 so the summary is derived purely from before_count.
+        locker = _make_locker(log_file, n_filled=0)
+        with (
+            patch("screen_locker._status.EXTRA_BENEFITS_FILE", eb_file),
+            patch("screen_locker._status.current_streak", return_value=0),
+            patch("screen_locker._status.has_extended_early_bird", return_value=False),
+            patch("sys.exit"),
+        ):
+            run_status(locker)
+        out = capsys.readouterr().out
+        assert "Weekly minimum met exactly (4/4)." in out
diff --git a/screen_locker/tests/test_status_part2.py b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_part2.py
index 3055a5f..bd14829 100644
--- a/screen_locker/tests/test_status_part2.py
+++ b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_part2.py
@@ -23,20 +23,25 @@ class TestRunStatusFill:
     def test_fill_with_bonus_applied(
         self, tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture
     ) -> None:
-        """n_filled > 0, bonus > 0, adjust succeeds → bonus line shown."""
+        """n_filled > 0, bonus > 0, adjust succeeds → bonus line shown.
+
+        count_weekly_workouts is called twice: before the fill (3) and after
+        (5) — a flat return_value would collapse both calls to the same
+        number and mask the bonus math, so this uses side_effect instead.
+        """
         eb_file = tmp_path / "eb.json"
         locker = _make_locker(tmp_path / "log.json", n_filled=2, bonus_applied=True)
-        # after_count=5 (> WEEKLY_WORKOUT_MINIMUM=4), before_count=3
         with (
             patch("screen_locker._status.EXTRA_BENEFITS_FILE", eb_file),
             patch("screen_locker._status.current_streak", return_value=0),
             patch("screen_locker._status.has_extended_early_bird", return_value=False),
-            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", return_value=5),
+            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", side_effect=[3, 5]),
             patch("sys.exit"),
         ):
             run_status(locker)
         out = capsys.readouterr().out
         assert "Auto-filled 2 workout(s)" in out
+        assert "+1h shutdown bonus applied." in out
 
     def test_fill_bonus_pending_when_adjust_fails(
         self, tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture
@@ -48,7 +53,7 @@ class TestRunStatusFill:
             patch("screen_locker._status.EXTRA_BENEFITS_FILE", eb_file),
             patch("screen_locker._status.current_streak", return_value=0),
             patch("screen_locker._status.has_extended_early_bird", return_value=False),
-            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", return_value=5),
+            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", side_effect=[0, 5]),
             patch("sys.exit"),
         ):
             run_status(locker)
@@ -58,14 +63,14 @@ class TestRunStatusFill:
     def test_fill_no_bonus_when_still_below_min(
         self, tmp_path: Path, capsys: pytest.CaptureFixture
     ) -> None:
-        """n_filled=1 but count still < 4 → no bonus line."""
+        """n_filled=1 but count still < 4, before and after the fill → no bonus."""
         eb_file = tmp_path / "eb.json"
         locker = _make_locker(tmp_path / "log.json", n_filled=1, bonus_applied=False)
         with (
             patch("screen_locker._status.EXTRA_BENEFITS_FILE", eb_file),
             patch("screen_locker._status.current_streak", return_value=0),
             patch("screen_locker._status.has_extended_early_bird", return_value=False),
-            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", return_value=3),
+            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", side_effect=[2, 3]),
             patch("sys.exit"),
         ):
             run_status(locker)
@@ -82,7 +87,7 @@ class TestRunStatusMinimumStatus:
         """after_count > WEEKLY_WORKOUT_MINIMUM → 'above minimum' line.
 
         n_filled=1 triggers the count_weekly_workouts() branch so after_count
-        is taken from that mock (5), not from the per-day log loop (0).
+        is taken from the second mocked call (5), not the first (before_count).
         """
         eb_file = tmp_path / "eb.json"
         locker = _make_locker(tmp_path / "log.json", n_filled=1, bonus_applied=False)
@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ class TestRunStatusMinimumStatus:
             patch("screen_locker._status.EXTRA_BENEFITS_FILE", eb_file),
             patch("screen_locker._status.current_streak", return_value=0),
             patch("screen_locker._status.has_extended_early_bird", return_value=False),
-            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", return_value=5),
+            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", side_effect=[0, 5]),
             patch("sys.exit"),
         ):
             run_status(locker)
@@ -111,7 +116,7 @@ class TestRunStatusMinimumStatus:
             patch("screen_locker._status.EXTRA_BENEFITS_FILE", eb_file),
             patch("screen_locker._status.current_streak", return_value=0),
             patch("screen_locker._status.has_extended_early_bird", return_value=False),
-            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", return_value=4),
+            patch("screen_locker._status.count_weekly_workouts", side_effect=[0, 4]),
             patch("sys.exit"),
         ):
             run_status(locker)
diff --git a/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view.py b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view.py
index 20978ec..5f6902a 100644
--- a/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view.py
+++ b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view.py
@@ -2,10 +2,14 @@
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
-from unittest.mock import MagicMock
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
 
 from screen_locker._compliance_state import AutoUpgradeOpportunity
-from screen_locker._status_view_verify import _verify_phone_then_runnerup
+from screen_locker._status_view_verify import (
+    PhoneCheckOutcome,
+    _backfill_week_and_apply_bonus,
+    _verify_phone_then_runnerup,
+)
 from screen_locker.tests._status_view_helpers import (
     _day,
     _lock_explanation,
@@ -189,7 +193,9 @@ class TestVerifyPhoneThenRunnerup:
 
         result = _verify_phone_then_runnerup(verifier)
 
-        assert result == ("phone_verified", "verified", "5x5 done", None)
+        assert result == PhoneCheckOutcome(
+            "phone_verified", "verified", "5x5 done", None
+        )
         verifier._verify_runnerup_workout.assert_not_called()
 
     def test_falls_back_to_runnerup_when_phone_not_verified(self) -> None:
@@ -200,14 +206,89 @@ class TestVerifyPhoneThenRunnerup:
 
         result = _verify_phone_then_runnerup(verifier)
 
-        assert result == ("runnerup_verified", "verified", "stale", "9.8 km")
+        assert result == PhoneCheckOutcome(
+            "runnerup_verified", "verified", "stale", "9.8 km"
+        )
 
-    def test_neither_source_verified(self) -> None:
-        """Neither verified → no credited type, both messages carried back."""
+    def test_neither_source_verified_nor_backfilled(self) -> None:
+        """Neither verified today, nothing to backfill → no credit, no fill message."""
         verifier = MagicMock()
         verifier._verify_phone_workout.return_value = ("not_verified", "stale")
         verifier._verify_runnerup_workout.return_value = ("too_short", "3 km")
+        verifier._scan_and_fill_week_runnerup.return_value = 0
+        verifier._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week.return_value = 0
 
-        result = _verify_phone_then_runnerup(verifier)
+        with patch(
+            "screen_locker._status_view_verify.count_weekly_workouts",
+            return_value=2,
+        ):
+            result = _verify_phone_then_runnerup(verifier)
 
-        assert result == (None, "too_short", "stale", "3 km")
+        assert result == PhoneCheckOutcome(None, "too_short", "stale", "3 km", None)
+
+    def test_falls_back_to_week_scan_backfill(self) -> None:
+        """Neither verified today, but the week-scan finds something → fill message."""
+        verifier = MagicMock()
+        verifier._verify_phone_workout.return_value = ("not_verified", "stale")
+        verifier._verify_runnerup_workout.return_value = ("not_verified", "no run")
+        verifier._scan_and_fill_week_runnerup.return_value = 1
+        verifier._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week.return_value = 0
+
+        with patch(
+            "screen_locker._status_view_verify.count_weekly_workouts",
+            side_effect=[2, 3],
+        ):
+            result = _verify_phone_then_runnerup(verifier)
+
+        assert result.credited_type is None
+        assert (
+            result.week_fill_message == "Auto-filled 1 workout from earlier this week."
+        )
+        verifier._adjust_shutdown_time_by.assert_not_called()
+
+
+class TestBackfillWeekAndApplyBonus:
+    """The week-scan fallback: backfill unlogged days, apply the earned bonus."""
+
+    def test_nothing_filled_returns_none(self) -> None:
+        verifier = MagicMock()
+        verifier._scan_and_fill_week_runnerup.return_value = 0
+        verifier._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week.return_value = 0
+
+        with patch(
+            "screen_locker._status_view_verify.count_weekly_workouts",
+            return_value=2,
+        ):
+            assert _backfill_week_and_apply_bonus(verifier) is None
+        verifier._adjust_shutdown_time_by.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_fill_at_or_below_minimum_earns_no_bonus(self) -> None:
+        """Filling up to (not past) the weekly minimum earns no shutdown push."""
+        verifier = MagicMock()
+        verifier._scan_and_fill_week_runnerup.return_value = 1
+        verifier._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week.return_value = 0
+
+        with patch(
+            "screen_locker._status_view_verify.count_weekly_workouts",
+            side_effect=[3, 4],
+        ):
+            message = _backfill_week_and_apply_bonus(verifier)
+
+        assert message == "Auto-filled 1 workout from earlier this week."
+        verifier._adjust_shutdown_time_by.assert_not_called()
+
+    def test_fill_past_minimum_applies_bonus(self) -> None:
+        verifier = MagicMock()
+        verifier._scan_and_fill_week_runnerup.return_value = 1
+        verifier._try_fill_stronglifts_for_week.return_value = 1
+
+        with patch(
+            "screen_locker._status_view_verify.count_weekly_workouts",
+            side_effect=[4, 6],
+        ):
+            message = _backfill_week_and_apply_bonus(verifier)
+
+        assert message == (
+            "Auto-filled 2 workouts from earlier this week. +2h shutdown time."
+        )
+        verifier._adjust_shutdown_time_by.assert_called_once_with(2)
diff --git a/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view_part2.py b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view_part2.py
index 6146656..0e6f64d 100644
--- a/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view_part2.py
+++ b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view_part2.py
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ from __future__ import annotations
 from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
 from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
 
+from screen_locker._status_view_verify import PhoneCheckOutcome
 from screen_locker._workout_credit import WorkoutCreditResult
 from screen_locker.status_view import (
     StatusWindow,
@@ -101,16 +102,6 @@ class TestRefreshAndCheckPhoneFlow:
             window._on_check_phone_clicked()
         assert window._phone_future is not None
 
-    def test_poll_routes_to_result_when_future_done(self, mock_tk: MagicMock) -> None:
-        window = _make_window(mock_tk, _snapshot())
-        mock_future = MagicMock()
-        mock_future.done.return_value = True
-        mock_future.result.return_value = ("verified", "ok")
-        window._phone_future = mock_future
-        with patch.object(window, "_on_phone_check_result") as mock_handle:
-            window._poll_phone_check()
-        mock_handle.assert_called_once_with("verified", "ok")
-
     def test_poll_waits_when_future_not_done(self, mock_tk: MagicMock) -> None:
         window = _make_window(mock_tk, _snapshot())
         mock_future = MagicMock()
@@ -136,7 +127,9 @@ class TestRefreshAndCheckPhoneFlow:
         with patch(
             "screen_locker._status_view_verify.gather_status", return_value=_snapshot()
         ) as mock_gather:
-            window._on_phone_check_result(None, "no_phone", "no lifts", "no run")
+            window._on_phone_check_result(
+                PhoneCheckOutcome(None, "no_phone", "no lifts", "no run")
+            )
         assert window._phone_check_result == (
             "no_phone",
             "StrongLifts: no lifts · RunnerUp: no run",
@@ -168,7 +161,7 @@ class TestRefreshAndCheckPhoneFlow:
             "screen_locker._status_view_verify.gather_status", return_value=_snapshot()
         ):
             window._on_phone_check_result(
-                "phone_verified", "verified", "StrongLifts ok", None
+                PhoneCheckOutcome("phone_verified", "verified", "StrongLifts ok", None)
             )
         assert fake_verifier.workout_data == {
             "type": "phone_verified",
@@ -205,7 +198,9 @@ class TestRefreshAndCheckPhoneFlow:
             "screen_locker._status_view_verify.gather_status", return_value=_snapshot()
         ):
             window._on_phone_check_result(
-                "runnerup_verified", "verified", "no lifts", "RunnerUp 5.0 km"
+                PhoneCheckOutcome(
+                    "runnerup_verified", "verified", "no lifts", "RunnerUp 5.0 km"
+                )
             )
         assert fake_verifier.workout_data == {
             "type": "runnerup_verified",
diff --git a/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view_part3.py b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view_part3.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e4291c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/screen_locker/tests/test_status_view_part3.py
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+"""Tests for status_view.py: Check Phone's week-scan backfill reporting."""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from unittest.mock import MagicMock, patch
+
+from screen_locker._status_view_verify import PhoneCheckOutcome
+from screen_locker.tests._status_view_helpers import _make_window, _snapshot
+
+
+class TestPollRoutesPhoneCheckOutcome:
+    def test_poll_routes_to_result_when_future_done(self, mock_tk: MagicMock) -> None:
+        window = _make_window(mock_tk, _snapshot())
+        mock_future = MagicMock()
+        mock_future.done.return_value = True
+        mock_future.result.return_value = PhoneCheckOutcome(
+            "phone_verified", "verified", "ok", None
+        )
+        window._phone_future = mock_future
+        with patch.object(window, "_on_phone_check_result") as mock_handle:
+            window._poll_phone_check()
+        mock_handle.assert_called_once_with(mock_future.result.return_value)
+
+
+class TestWeekScanBackfillResult:
+    def test_week_scan_backfill_shows_fill_message_and_applies_no_credit(
+        self, mock_tk: MagicMock
+    ) -> None:
+        """A week-scan backfill message is shown as-is, no _apply_workout_credit call."""
+        fake_verifier = MagicMock()
+        window = _make_window(
+            mock_tk,
+            _snapshot(),
+            verifier_factory=lambda _log_file: fake_verifier,
+        )
+        with patch(
+            "screen_locker._status_view_verify.gather_status", return_value=_snapshot()
+        ):
+            window._on_phone_check_result(
+                PhoneCheckOutcome(
+                    None,
+                    "not_verified",
+                    "no lifts",
+                    "no run",
+                    "Auto-filled 1 workout from earlier this week.",
+                )
+            )
+        assert window._credit_message == "Auto-filled 1 workout from earlier this week."
+        assert window._phone_check_result is None
+        fake_verifier._apply_workout_credit.assert_not_called()