Fifth and last app onto freedays (~/utils/freedays). screen-locker is the
one that already had this idea: scheduled_skips.json was a bare list of
dates, checked first in the lock chain, that only this app could see.
That is exactly what the shared pool generalises, so the chain now asks
freedays and a day taken here also stands down diet-guard, wake-alarm,
leetcode-guard and home-guard.
Sick days are deliberately untouched. Their rolling windows (1/7d, 3/30d,
10/90d), the 120-character justification and the escalating countdown all
exist to make a sick day *hard* to take. Free days are the opposite --
declared ahead, no reason, consecutive runs allowed. Merging the two
policies would have had to ruin one of them, so only the storage of the
frictionless half moved.
This fixes a real bug in passing. is_scheduled_skip_today compared
against a UTC day while add_scheduled_skip.py wrote a local one, so a
skip added near midnight could name a date the chain never matched.
freedays owns "what is today" for both sides now, in local time, and the
disagreement cannot recur.
scripts/migrate_scheduled_skips.py moves the existing dates across; it is
idempotent and has a --dry-run. Already run here: the 8 real skips
(2026-05-19/20/21, 05-29, 05-30, 08-17, 08-22, 08-29) are in the pool and
count against 2026, leaving 27 of 35. The original file is gitignored and
was left on disk untouched.
add_scheduled_skip.py becomes a thin wrapper over freedays rather than
being deleted, because arm.sh calls it and the name is in muscle memory.
Left as-is it would have kept writing to a file nothing reads.
conftest.py went over the 250-line cap, so the two fixtures that keep the
suite off real user state moved to _real_state_fixtures.py. They belong
together and neither subsumes the other: _isolate_home covers paths
resolved from Path.home() at call time, while the freedays redirect
covers paths bound into module constants at import time, which
redirecting home afterwards cannot reach.
requirements.txt also takes pytest-randomly 5.0.0, ruff 0.16.6 and
types-requests 2.33.0.20260906, and the pylint hooks' gatelock/crdt-sync
pins move off v0.7.1/v0.9.0 -- pip refuses two direct URLs for one
distribution, so those stale pins would have made the hook environments
unresolvable rather than merely old.
1256 tests, 100% branch coverage.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The locker did not fire on 2026-08-29, or for the two weeks before it.
Every 30 minutes it logged:
DECISION lock=no reason=weekly_minimum_met weekly=5/5
The 5 was wrong. A StrongLifts session is ingested twice -- the phone sync
writes phone_verified, the PC session sync writes pc_workout_verified, both
from the same WorkoutSession payload -- and workout_id is "<type>:<date>",
so the two copies get different IDs and neither dedups the other away.
count_weekly_workouts then counted each entry individually.
Real totals against what was counted:
week of 2026-08-17 5 counted 4 real
week of 2026-08-24 5 counted 3 real
Both weeks were waived. Nothing reported a problem, because 5/5 is exactly
what a compliant week looks like.
Add credit_key/count_day_credits to _weekly_check as the single rule for
"does this entry earn a credit, and is it the same credit as another": the
two StrongLifts ingestion paths share one slot per day, everything else
stays per-entry so two runs or two manual workouts in a day still count
twice. Exported, so counters share the rule instead of re-deriving it --
re-derivation is what caused this.
Route _status_data._day_status through it too. It had re-derived the rule
as "verified + (1 if has_manual else 0)", which disagreed with
count_weekly_workouts on any day with two manual workouts; since that value
feeds the status view's weekly_minimum_met explanation, the window could
explain a decision the locker never made.
Two existing fixtures reached their counts using two same-day
phone_verified entries -- the double-count itself. They now use a gym
session plus a run, which is two real workouts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Fcwu78wk17FWMHbbfbyicc
`requires-python` and the CI pin already said 3.14, but ruff, mypy and pylint
were still grading against 3.10 -- three tools judging an interpreter nothing
runs any more, and ruff withholding the pyupgrade fixes that only become safe
at the newer target. `pin_ci_python.py` rewrites exactly these three knobs.
What the stale target was hiding: 118 sites on `datetime.timezone.utc` instead
of `datetime.UTC` (UP017), two classes still written with `Generic[...]` rather
than PEP 695 syntax, and ruff's stable formatter applying PEP 758 --
`except (A, B):` becomes `except A, B:`. That last one makes the source
3.14-only at the syntax level, which is what `requires-python = ">=3.14"`
already promised; kuhy chose it deliberately over holding ruff a release back
(2026-08-29).
The PEP 695 fix needed a hand: ruff rewrote `class WidgetGroup(Generic[_W])`
to `class WidgetGroup[W: tk.Misc]` but left the body annotated with the
module-level `_W`, a *different* type variable -- mypy caught it as "a function
returning TypeVar should receive at least one argument containing the same
TypeVar". Renamed the body to the new parameter, gave `FrameGroup.__init__`
the concrete `list[tk.Frame]` it always wrapped, and deleted the two now-dead
module-level TypeVars.
ruff, ruff-format, mypy --strict and both pylint passes clean at the new target.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SfnJmxxsZ534AKk16rC2Gr
