mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/screen-locker.git
synced 2026-11-11 21:13:55 +01:00
|
Some checks are pending
pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
Tests / test (3.10) (push) Waiting to run
Tests / test (3.11) (push) Waiting to run
Tests / test (3.12) (push) Waiting to run
Tests / lock-popup-safety (push) Waiting to run
release-apk / release (APK) (push) Waiting to run
The phone and PC each compute a nominally SHARED manual-workout budget over
the same merged records, and disagreed on both halves of it.
The cap: _constants.py has said 10 per 30 days since 298daf0; the Dart mirror
was still 5, so between 5 and 9 the phone hard-blocked the form for a workout
the PC would have accepted and credited. The stricter side wins, so this cost
logged workouts rather than granting extra ones.
The counting rule: count_in_window counts ENTRIES ("each logged manual workout
consumes its own budget slot"), while countManualBudget built a Set of date
strings and counted DAYS -- despite a docstring claiming it mirrored the PC.
Three workouts on one day read 3/2 on the PC, over its 7-day cap, but 1/2 on
the phone, which kept accepting. Both now report 3 for that input. Per-entry is
the correct semantic because each entry separately earns weekly-count and
shutdown credit, so each must separately cost budget.
The wire fixture could never have caught either: the caps and the counting rule
never travel on the wire. The comment claiming it was "the tripwire that
catches drift" was wrong and is corrected. The real guard,
TestCrossLanguageBudgetConstants, parses manual_workout.dart and compares it to
the imported Python constants -- one test that fails on EITHER side's drift.
Asserting a Python constant against a Python literal would have stayed green
through
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| exercise_result_test.dart | ||
| exercise_test.dart | ||
| manual_workout_test.dart | ||
| set_result_test.dart | ||
| workout_plan_test.dart | ||
| workout_session_test.dart | ||