mirror of
https://github.com/kuhyx/screen-locker.git
synced 2026-11-11 18:33:57 +01:00
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki
aa3e290391
Real one-line docstrings stating what each test pins down. Files that would pass 250 lines moved whole classes into _part2 siblings (sick_panel, earned, poke_server, shutdown_reading, manual_workout_dialog). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01WzxdWYdwRAtMg7ki6TKxuU
84 lines
2.9 KiB
Python
84 lines
2.9 KiB
Python
"""Tests for the multi-reason annotation on lock decisions."""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import logging
|
|
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
|
|
|
|
from screen_locker._decision_reasons import collect_reasons, reasons_extra
|
|
|
|
if TYPE_CHECKING:
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestCollectReasons:
|
|
"""Every condition that holds is reported, not just the first."""
|
|
|
|
def test_returns_only_the_predicates_that_hold(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Only the names whose predicate is true are returned, in order."""
|
|
held = collect_reasons(
|
|
{"a": lambda: True, "b": lambda: False, "c": lambda: True}
|
|
)
|
|
assert held == ["a", "c"]
|
|
|
|
def test_empty_when_nothing_holds(self) -> None:
|
|
"""No true predicate yields an empty list."""
|
|
assert collect_reasons({"a": lambda: False}) == []
|
|
|
|
def test_a_failing_predicate_is_reported_and_skipped(
|
|
self, caplog: pytest.LogCaptureFixture
|
|
) -> None:
|
|
"""A broken annotation must not take down the decision it annotates."""
|
|
|
|
def boom() -> bool:
|
|
"""Predicate that fails with an OSError."""
|
|
msg = "log unreadable"
|
|
raise OSError(msg)
|
|
|
|
with caplog.at_level(logging.WARNING):
|
|
held = collect_reasons({"a": lambda: True, "boom": boom})
|
|
|
|
assert held == ["a"]
|
|
# The omission must be loud: an invisible gap would read as "the
|
|
# condition did not hold", which is the opposite of what happened.
|
|
assert "boom" in caplog.text
|
|
assert "log unreadable" in caplog.text
|
|
|
|
|
|
class TestReasonsExtra:
|
|
"""The acting reason is never repeated back as an 'also'."""
|
|
|
|
def test_excludes_the_acting_reason(self) -> None:
|
|
"""The acting reason is left out of the 'also' list."""
|
|
extra = reasons_extra(
|
|
"early_bird_window_active",
|
|
{
|
|
"early_bird_window_active": lambda: True,
|
|
"workout_logged_today": lambda: True,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
assert extra == {"also": "workout_logged_today"}
|
|
|
|
def test_orders_and_joins_every_other_condition(self) -> None:
|
|
"""Every other holding condition is joined in order into the 'also' value."""
|
|
extra = reasons_extra(
|
|
"early_bird_window_active",
|
|
{
|
|
"early_bird_window_active": lambda: True,
|
|
"workout_logged_today": lambda: True,
|
|
"weekly_minimum_met": lambda: True,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
assert extra == {"also": "workout_logged_today,weekly_minimum_met"}
|
|
|
|
def test_empty_when_the_acting_reason_is_the_only_one(self) -> None:
|
|
"""A single-reason decision keeps rendering exactly its old line."""
|
|
extra = reasons_extra(
|
|
"early_bird_window_active",
|
|
{
|
|
"early_bird_window_active": lambda: True,
|
|
"workout_logged_today": lambda: False,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
assert not extra
|