Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
0717df646a Rebuild the command table on demand, and survive a tag whose file is gone
Some checks are pending
CI / check (push) Waiting to run
CI / web (push) Waiting to run
The registry used to be built once, inline in build_bot, so every change to
the data behind it -- a person tagged in the web UI, an alias, soon a command
switched off from the management page -- meant restarting the unit. That is
cheap and lossless, but it is a deploy step somebody has to remember, and a
21:37 report can land in the middle of it.

Now the registration sequence lives in wiring.build_registry, and
RegistryHolder runs it again on POST /_reload: the new table is built whole
and swapped in with one assignment, never patched in place, so a duplicate
trigger is found before anything the dispatcher reads has changed. Bad data
(ConfigError, DuplicateTriggerError) keeps the previous table and answers
409 with the reason; a programming error still surfaces as a 500.
scripts/reload.sh wraps it, with --code for the restart a Python change
needs, and an optional command to type in testbot so "reloaded" means
"answered". No Python hot-reload on purpose.

The loader change is what makes deploying this safe: two rows in the live
tags.json name files that are no longer in media/, and load_pack refused
them, so the next restart would have looped on ConfigError. A stale tag is
drift in a file a page edits mid-session, not a broken album -- it is now
skipped with a warning naming it. A tag that reaches outside the album is
still refused. pack_load.py split at the 250-line cap; pack_tags.py is the
half whose checks are not all fatal.

Proven offline in scripts/e2e.sh: !delta is unknown, a fifth person is
tagged into the synthetic pack, scripts/reload.sh runs, and the same
process posts delta's photo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-04 10:14:39 +02:00
48957a105d feat: serve several photo albums at once, each scoped to its own groups
Some checks are pending
CI / check (push) Waiting to run
You asked for !add_photo in testbot without the real album being reachable
there. One album cannot do that: its people.json "groups" list *is* the
privacy guarantee, so making the commands exist in a second group necessarily
makes the real photos postable there. So the bot now loads several albums.

PHOTO_PACK_DIR takes a comma-separated list, the spelling GROUP_IDS and
TRUSTED_INVITERS already use. Each album carries its own group scope, its own
people, its own tags and its own custom labels; they share nothing but the
process they run in.

That makes trigger collisions between albums legal for the first time, and the
registry had to learn it. Two albums are two different sets of people and both
may reasonably call somebody "!alfa" -- no message can ever mean both, because
a command a group is not scoped to is not a command there at all. So a trigger
may be claimed more than once, and DuplicateTriggerError now fires only where
the group sets *overlap*. Overlapping albums are refused at startup rather than
resolved by registration order: a coin toss about which private album receives
a photo is the outcome this whole design exists to prevent.

Two consequences worth naming:

- registry.resolve() takes an optional group. Without one it still answers
  "does anything claim this word", which is what pack_add's mint check wants;
  with one it answers "what runs here", which is what the dispatcher wants.
  resolve_with_args no longer resolves-then-checks, because with two claimants
  the first one found may be the wrong group's.
- CommandContext moved to signal_bot/context.py to keep registry.py under the
  250-line cap. A filing change: that file is "which word runs what", this one
  is "what the thing that runs may do".

DOCS-add-photo.md is likewise a split, not new prose -- DOCS-photo-pack.md had
grown past the cap and the ingest path is its own subject now.

Verified live: the unit serves both albums, the real group resolves its 13
album commands and testbot its 7, and !losowe / !alfa / !dodaj all fire in
testbot through the live dispatcher. 997 tests, 100% branch coverage, 28 e2e
scenarios.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JqqE22jp94B1ypwxppdr1o
2026-08-31 11:58:50 +02:00
35102be863 release: 0.2.0 «Urbanus I» — a private photo album, and a tagger for it
Per-person photo commands, where the mechanism is public and the album is
not. Nothing identifying is in this repository: who the people are, what
fires their photos and which file shows whom all live in one directory
outside it, and the tests, the docs and the offline e2e run use three
invented people instead.

Several names in one message intersect -- "!alfa beta" is a photo with both
-- and where an entry offers a choice the bot picks among the readings that
actually have a photo, so a question the album could answer is not refused.
A combination nobody photographed gets one line rather than silence, which
from the group's side is indistinguishable from a broken bot.

Scoping is enforced in the dispatcher, not in the handler: a command the
group is not allowed resolves to nothing, so it is not answered, not counted
as a command, and never named in a log line outside its own groups. A
handler that quietly returned would leak all three. Commands are named by
pseudonym (pack:p1), so the journal and command_uses say somebody asked for
a photo and nothing about whose.

Video works: the attachment goes out as data:video/mp4;filename=...;base64,
which is the container's own spelling, read off its /swagger/doc.json.
Told it is a photo, Signal renders a clip as an unplayable file.

tool/tagger.py serves one page on loopback to fill the album in -- names are
typed into the page, never as arguments, and it prints how many photos each
command would have when it stops, because a command with zero is dead on
arrival.

Also renames the real people who were still sitting in the stats test
fixtures. They remain in the history; the point is that nothing new is
added to it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017w1HZ3cZ7neL3rFdQ6VMBA
2026-08-30 22:35:41 +02:00
ca38147576 release: 0.1.4 «Eleuteriusz» — the list of commands lives in the chat now
Thirteen commands, and the only list of them was a README table nobody in a
Signal group can read — which had itself gone stale two releases earlier,
still advertising four commands after nine more had shipped. 0.1.1 gave each
command an output that says what the command is; that only helps once you
already know to type it.

!pomoc (also !pomocy, !help, !komendy, !commands) prints all fourteen,
grouped, one Polish line each.

The interesting part is that it cannot go stale. CommandRegistry.register now
takes the description as a REQUIRED argument, so a command that does not
explain itself does not compile; and render_help prints any command that
help_command.GROUPS forgot to file, under no heading, rather than dropping
it. Two independent ways to fail closed, because the README proved that a
hand-maintained second list is a list that drifts.

Command also gained `primary`, the first raw alias. The trigger set could not
supply it: those are folded skeletons in an unordered frozenset, so all that
survives of "!papież" there is "!papiez", and the styled Unicode aliases come
out as zalgo. aliases.json already lists the canonical Polish spelling first.

The full trigger table moves to DOCS-commands.md. It did not fit in README —
that file was already sitting exactly on the shared 250-line cap, and the
gate caught the overflow on the first commit attempt.

Exercised in testbot at the unbumped version before this bump: the live
dispatcher ran it and posted the list, journal clean. pytest 708 green at
100% branch coverage, e2e green including a new scenario that asserts !pomoc
mentions a command registered by a different module.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017w1HZ3cZ7neL3rFdQ6VMBA
2026-08-30 21:08:02 +02:00
116671236a fix: a refused command no longer re-arms its own cooldown
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-30 20:39:14 +02:00