signal-bot/signal_bot/context.py
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki 405541be9b
Some checks are pending
CI / check (push) Waiting to run
CI / web (push) Waiting to run
release: 0.2.6 «Stephanus I» — dodano !analityka
One row per command attempt, not two aggregates written only on success.

command_uses holds last-use only and daily_uses counts successes; both are
rate-limiter state and both are written by store.record_use, which the
dispatcher calls only when a handler returns cleanly. A gate refusal and a
crash returned before it, so a command that failed every time looked exactly
like one nobody ran, and nothing knew which command a counted message was.

command_events now takes every attempt with its outcome, its duration and
the item it served; upstream_calls takes every outbound request made while
serving one. The two writes stay separate on purpose -- recording a refusal
as a use is what slid the cooldown window forward every time somebody was
told to wait -- and test_dispatcher_outcomes asserts last_used does not move.

Backfilled from journald joined against message_events, with daily_uses
filling the residual so the two sources cannot double-count. Two things were
wrong on the first attempt and both were found by measuring rather than by
reasoning: the window has to be symmetric, because sent_at_ms comes from the
sender's phone and the journal stamp from this host (194 of 299 lines landed
*before* their own message, by up to 3.2 s); and matching has to be a global
closest-pair assignment, because per-row greedy cannot separate two commands
seconds apart. Together those took the dropped rows from 137 to zero, and
recovered 418 invocations back to 29 August.

Also: !analityka in the group, twelve Polish lines, naming at most three
people and only ones whose display name has been seen; an Analytics tab with
Nivo charts; and continuous latency measurement, which answers the open
question in DOCS-latency.md -- a text send is 235 ms and an image send about
2.2 s, so the upload really is where the time goes.

EPHEMERAL_TABLES was doing two unrelated jobs and is now two tuples: what a
schema bump rebuilds, and what leaving a group clears. daily_uses left the
first (it is a backfill source now) and stayed in the second, and
_drop_reshaped took over the repair a bump used to do for it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01T4QTp3h5Q3MvfrwGV8xqPf
2026-08-31 23:19:51 +02:00

74 lines
2.7 KiB
Python

# Copyright (c) 2026 Krzysztof Rudnicki. MIT licence.
"""What a command handler is allowed to touch, and how it answers.
Split out of registry.py at the 250-line cap. The division is real rather
than clerical: that file is "which word runs what", this one is "what the
thing that runs may do" -- and the reply helpers are the only place in the
codebase that decides *where* an answer goes.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING
from signal_bot.analytics.probe import timed_send
from signal_bot.quoting import quote_of
if TYPE_CHECKING:
from signal_bot.config import Config
from signal_bot.models import IncomingMessage
from signal_bot.store import Store
from signal_bot.transport_base import Transport
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CommandContext:
"""Everything a command handler is allowed to touch."""
message: IncomingMessage
group_id: str
transport: Transport
store: Store
config: Config
command_name: str
now: float
day: str
# Whatever followed the trigger, split on whitespace. Empty for every
# command that does not opt into taking any -- see Command.takes_args.
args: tuple[str, ...] = ()
async def reply(self, text: str) -> None:
"""Answer the message that triggered this command, in its group.
There is no configurable reply target. A command answers where it
was asked, which is the only routing that stays correct once the
bot watches a test group and a production group at once -- and it
quotes the asker, so a busy group can tell which "!cat" this is.
"""
async with timed_send():
await self.transport.send_text(text, self.group_id, quote_of(self.message))
async def reply_image(self, image_base64: str, caption: str = "") -> None:
"""Answer the triggering message with an image, quoting it."""
async with timed_send():
await self.transport.send_image(
image_base64, self.group_id, quote_of(self.message), caption
)
async def reply_media(self, payload_base64: str, media_type: str, filename: str) -> None:
"""Answer with an attachment that is not necessarily a photo.
Separate from reply_image because Signal decides how to render an
attachment from what it is told it is, and "a jpeg" is a lie that
makes a video arrive as a file nobody can play.
"""
async with timed_send():
await self.transport.send_media(
payload_base64,
self.group_id,
quote_of(self.message),
media_type=media_type,
filename=filename,
)