Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
c1e028b49e Make the fd-scan test independent of iterdir() order
Some checks are pending
dependency freshness / dependencies on newest stable (push) Waiting to run
md-naming / markdown naming convention (push) Waiting to run
pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
Tests / test (push) Waiting to run
CI failed at 99.98%: _serve_guard.py:125-126, the `except OSError: continue`
in the fd scan, was never executed there. The test planted one unreadable
entry beside a real socket symlink and asserted the socket was still found —
which only exercises the skip if iterdir() happens to yield the broken entry
first. It does locally; on CI the socket came first, the function returned
early, and the skip never ran.

Now split in two: one case with only unreadable entries, which hits the skip
whatever the order, and one that keeps the original assertion that a broken
fd does not make the scan abandon the process.

The private guard helpers are also imported directly rather than reached
through the module, which drops 20-odd pylint protected-access warnings and
takes this file from 5.75 to passing on its own. The repo's pylint gate scores
an aggregate against --fail-under=8.0, so a file that is only ever committed
alongside others can hide below it; this one no longer needs the company.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MKFzwzwRU1JD7SFLHtQBsz
2026-08-29 18:57:01 +02:00
47f77f5f1e Make serve re-runnable, and cover it to 100%
Some checks are pending
dependency freshness / dependencies on newest stable (push) Waiting to run
md-naming / markdown naming convention (push) Waiting to run
pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
Tests / test (push) Waiting to run
The serve rework was sitting untracked: a /proc-based port guard, the
start-or-defer decision, and a stale-bundle rebuild. It had no tests, and it
changed cmd_serve(_config, state) to cmd_serve(argv) without updating the one
test that called it, so the suite was red and coverage was 251 lines short.

Tests, all against fakes:
- _fake_proc builds a synthetic /proc. _NET_TCP is derived from _PROC at
  import time, so patch_proc redirects both; patching _PROC alone would have
  had these tests parse the host's real process table.
- _serve_guard is split across two test files to stay under the 250-line cap.
  os is replaced wholesale in every termination test, so no signal can reach a
  real process even if the guard's self-protection were removed.
- _web_build mocks subprocess entirely and redirects every path constant into
  tmp_path. _no_subprocess now blocks _web_build.subprocess.run too: an
  unguarded test would fire a real `npm run build`, rewriting web/dist and
  perturbing frontend_is_stale() for every later test in the run.

Source changes, both required rather than incidental:
- _serve_guard's wildcard match was a `# noqa: S104` on a "0.0.0.0" literal,
  which the no-noqa hook rejects outright. It is now the all-zero hex column
  /proc actually prints, so the dotted-quad literal never appears.
- main/__init__.py's serve dispatch arm was itself uncovered; it now has a
  test asserting the raw argv passes through unparsed.

Also drops the document.hidden guard from useBudgetPoll: it skipped the very
first load, so the budget panel sat on "Reading budget state…" forever in a
background tab, which is every tab under browser automation.

Verified: 1712 python tests, 100% branch coverage; 128 vitest, 100%. The
guard's /proc parser was checked read-only against a real listener on :8000
and resolved the same pid as `ss`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MKFzwzwRU1JD7SFLHtQBsz
2026-08-29 18:52:11 +02:00