Three review findings, all before the hook is wired:
is_shell_lib excluded */lib/tests/* but not */tests/lib/*. Both are test
code; the second nesting made the gate demand tests/lib/tests/run_all.sh
for 10 helper files. It would have fired precisely while editing test
helpers to write the suites this ratchet asks for. Reseeded 125 -> 115.
--seed now refuses (exit 1) when a reseed would ADD an entry, instead of
a header comment asking nicely. It reads tracked files only, so an
unstaged probe seeds normally -- staging it produces the refusal with
the allowlist left byte-identical.
The parent commit's docs claimed an exempt file loses its exemption when
next modified. It does not: check_files exempts allowlisted paths
unconditionally, verified by staging an edit and getting exit 0. Fixed
the text, not the code -- making an edit trip the gate would block
routine work across 115 of 198 libraries, which is the repo-wide gate
this ratchet exists to avoid.
Also corrects the "a percentage is unreachable" rationale: commit
53e80462 reached 100% on an entry script with no suppressions. Presence
is still the right bar, because that took per-file mount analysis.
Measurement-only. No production file changed.
The gating question was whether the campaign's constraints are jointly
satisfiable: 100% line coverage over ALL .sh files with no suppressions.
Phase 1 measured effecting code at 0% under PATH shims, which implied
either forbidden suppressions or source seams in 17+46 files.
They are satisfiable. A user+mount namespace reaches 100% with zero
source changes: --map-root-user makes require_root fall through, and
bind-mounting each write target makes installer writes land in the jail.
setup_night_lockdown.sh went 81.58% (PATH shims) -> 86.84% (userns) ->
100.00% (38/38, all mounts).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01F3PzGc75gBcdxP3PkHXGcV
