Repair the two CI signals gatelock 0.8.x broke, and drop its finished pylint TODO

The palette-drift check parsed LockConfig's colour defaults; they live
on LockPalette in _theme.py since 0.8.0, so it read zero tokens and
failed closed as designed. The two new LockWindow handles had no test
reaching them, which CI's 100% bar caught and the local run did not.

gatelock/prompts/TODO-pylint-to-ten.md described this job with the
older design (raise the score, leave the gate); the gate is at 10.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HHCbkJWXHjtTUaqvnHRAqA

gatelock/gatelock/tests/test_window.py

@@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ class TestSetup:
         topmost_on = True
         mock_root.attributes.assert_any_call("-topmost", topmost_on)
 
+    def test_suspend_handles_are_the_armed_collaborators(self, mock_root) -> None:
+        """An app that suspends the lock stops the very loop and watcher it arms."""
+        window, _hooks = make_window(mock_root, config=LockConfig(mode="soft"))
+
+        assert window.recovery is window._arming.recovery
+        assert window.detector is window._arming.detector
+
 
 class TestGrabInput:
     """Tests for LockWindow.grab_input."""

gatelock/prompts/TODO-pylint-to-ten.md

@@ -1,113 +0,0 @@
-# Session prompt: take gatelock's pylint from 9.06 to 10.00
-
-Paste everything below the line into a fresh Claude Code session started in
-`~/src/utils` (the monorepo root — **not** `~/src/utils/gatelock`; pre-commit runs
-hooks from the git root and every path in the hook config is relative to it).
-
----
-
-Take `gatelock`'s pylint score from **9.06/10 to a clean 10.00/10**, without
-weakening the linter.
-
-## Why
-
-The pylint hook runs with `--fail-under=8.0`, so 9.06 passes while carrying
-~394 findings. The same job was done in the sibling package
-`~/src/utils/crdt-sync` on 2026-08-21 (8.58 -> 10.00), so the conventions and the
-gate are already proven one directory over — read that package's
-`crdt_sync/tests/conftest.py` and the commits `1b8c99d` / `2005c40` in
-`~/src/utils` for the worked example.
-
-Measured on this machine, 2026-08-21, with
-`~/.cache/pre-commit/repo01lfw04p/py_env-python3/bin/pylint --rcfile=pyproject.toml gatelock`
-run from `~/src/utils/gatelock`:
-
-| category | count |
-|---|---|
-| redefined-outer-name | 171 |
-| protected-access | 141 |
-| missing-function-docstring | 19 |
-| use-implicit-booleaness-not-comparison-to-zero | 14 |
-| use-implicit-booleaness-not-comparison | 12 |
-| unbalanced-tuple-unpacking | 9 |
-
-**312 of the top two categories are in `gatelock/tests/`.** This repo is NOT
-the docstring problem the other two are — only 19 docstrings are missing.
-It is dominated by **pytest fixture idiom**, which makes it a different job:
-
-- `redefined-outer-name` (171) is the classic fixture-shadowing pattern — a
-  test parameter named the same as the module-level fixture function.
-- `protected-access` (141) is tests reaching into the private members that
-  are the unit under test.
-
-Note for context: `~/src/screen-locker`'s tests hook already disables
-`protected-access` / `unused-argument` / `duplicate-code` for exactly this
-reason. gatelock does not, and that gap is most of the 0.94.
-
-Re-measure before you start and again at the end.
-
-## Scope
-
-**In scope**
-1. Every pylint finding under `gatelock/`.
-
-**Out of scope — do not touch**
-- `--fail-under` in `gatelock/.pre-commit-config.yaml`. Do NOT raise it to
-  hide a shortfall, and do NOT lower it. Leave it at 8.0.
-- Any sibling package in the monorepo — `crdt-sync/`, `web_ui/`,
-  `design_system/`, `sync_settings_ui/`. Stage narrowly: `gatelock/` only.
-- Note `crdt-sync/tool/seed_session.py` is modified and
-  `crdt-sync/firebase-debug.log` is untracked; both predate this task. Keep
-  them out of your commit.
-
-## The decision this task actually turns on
-
-The 312 fixture-idiom findings are not individually fixable in any
-satisfying way, and this is the fork to bring to the user **before** doing
-the work, not after:
-
-- **Option A — configure the checks off for tests only.** Add a
-  `[tool.pylint...]` per-path setting or a tests-scoped disable for
-  `redefined-outer-name` + `protected-access`. This is what screen-locker
-  already does, it is honest (the checks are wrong for pytest, not the code),
-  and it is one reviewable decision instead of 312 edits. It IS a config
-  change, which the user has previously refused when the alternative was
-  real work — so it must be asked, with the screen-locker precedent cited.
-- **Option B — rename every shadowing parameter** and re-examine all 141
-  protected accesses individually. No config change; a very large diff
-  touching most of the test suite.
-
-Ask which, in one question, with A recommended and the precedent named. Do
-not start either until answered.
-
-## The rule for everything else
-
-**Fix the underlying issue; do not suppress it.** The repo blocks `noqa` and
-`type: ignore` outright. Inline `# pylint: disable=` is permitted only for a
-genuine false positive, scoped to the narrowest unit, placed on the line
-that actually triggers it (verify — a `disable-next` one line off silently
-does nothing and pylint reports `useless-suppression`), with a comment
-saying why.
-
-`unbalanced-tuple-unpacking` (9) is worth reading carefully rather than
-suppressing: it sometimes flags a real latent IndexError.
-
-## Gates
-
-- `python -m pytest -q` from `~/src/utils/gatelock` — **389 passing at 100%
-  branch coverage** (measured 2026-08-21). Both numbers must hold.
-- `pre-commit run --config gatelock/.pre-commit-config.yaml --files <changed>`
-  — run it from `~/src/utils`, and note the config's `files:` filter means paths
-  must be repo-root-relative (`gatelock/...`) or the hooks silently skip.
-- `ruff format` will reformat what you touch; re-run the suite afterwards.
-
-## Done means
-
-1. pylint reports **10.00/10** for `gatelock`.
-2. `--fail-under` still 8.0.
-3. 389 tests still passing at 100% branch coverage.
-4. No sibling package appears in your diff.
-5. The final report states which option the user chose for the fixture-idiom
-   findings, and lists every suppression with its justification.
-
-REMOVE ME AFTER FINISH

unified-design-system/scripts/palette_check.py

@@ -39,9 +39,10 @@ ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]
 TOKENS_MD = ROOT / "unified-design-system" / "DOCS-tokens.md"
 TOKENS_CSS = ROOT / "web_ui" / "src" / "tokens.css"
 TOKENS_DART = ROOT / "design_system" / "lib" / "src" / "tokens.dart"
-# LockConfig moved out of _window.py when that file was split for the
+# The palette moved twice: out of _window.py in the 250-line split, then out
-# 250-line cap; the palette lives with the dataclass, not the window.
+# of LockConfig into the LockPalette record (gatelock 0.8.0). The colours live
-LOCKCONFIG_PY = ROOT / "gatelock" / "gatelock" / "_config.py"
+# with that record, not with the behavioural config.
+LOCKCONFIG_PY = ROOT / "gatelock" / "gatelock" / "_theme.py"
 
 
 @dataclass
@@ -121,16 +122,16 @@ def parse_dart(text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
 
 
 def parse_tk(text: str) -> dict[str, str]:
-    """Parse `field: str = "#RRGGBB"` defaults out of the LockConfig block."""
+    """Parse `field: str = "#RRGGBB"` defaults out of the LockPalette block."""
     found: dict[str, str] = {}
-    start = text.find("class LockConfig")
+    start = text.find("class LockPalette")
     if start == -1:
         # Fail closed. Returning {} here made every tk comparison vacuously
         # pass when LockConfig moved to _config.py during the 250-line split:
         # "0 parsed token(s)" read as success, and the drift guard was off
         # for the whole gatelock stack without anything going red.
         msg = (
-            "LockConfig not found in the file palette_check reads. It has "
+            "LockPalette not found in the file palette_check reads. It has "
             "moved; update LOCKCONFIG_PY rather than letting the tk stack go "
             "unchecked."
         )