kuhyx/utils
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/kuhyx/utils.git synced 2026-11-10 22:07:15 +01:00
Code Issues Actions 16 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
207 Commits 1 Branch 162 Tags 7.9 MiB
d5b3f2cff3
Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Krzysztof kuhy Rudnicki
3565b281ca One Python per repo, always the newest, and the gate that enforces it 
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
 2026-08-28 20:58:19 +02:00
Krzysztof Rudnicki
a89f152564 Let the gatelock workflows trigger on their own files
Some checks failed
crdt-sync pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Waiting to run
Details
crdt-sync tests / test (3.10) (push) Waiting to run
Details
crdt-sync tests / test (3.11) (push) Waiting to run
Details
crdt-sync tests / test (3.12) (push) Waiting to run
Details
gatelock pre-commit / pre-commit (push) Has been cancelled
Details
gatelock tests / test (3.10) (push) Has been cancelled
Details
gatelock tests / test (3.11) (push) Has been cancelled
Details
gatelock tests / test (3.12) (push) Has been cancelled
Details 
The display fix in 161eccd could never prove itself: both workflows trigger
on `paths: ['gatelock/**']`, and the workflow files live under .github/, so
editing one changes nothing GitHub will act on. The tests job stayed red at
the last gatelock commit with the fix already pushed -- which is the worst
kind of green-looking red, because nothing was running to say otherwise.

A workflow is part of what it tests, so each now lists its own path.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BsXnTHyuuCUZsqetTaajcF
 2026-08-03 18:36:47 +02:00
Krzysztof Rudnicki
e1d54ff75e Root scaffold: README, LICENSE, per-subdirectory CI for utils monorepo 2026-07-10 13:02:20 +02:00